Do you agree with this perspective??
- Thread starter Mdfgator
- Start date
It's far more complicated than that. A more nuanced take can be seen by Frank Lutz (pollster) on CNBC's squawk box this morning.
Frank openly said - only one narrative (socialism, marxism, social marxism) is being taught on campuses today. When that is juxtaposed against the fraud of the CMO market / big short, legitimate structural racism through 1965 (Jim Crow), etc., escalating health care costs, escalating education costs and the relative success through 2015 of the Northern EU countries, a younger mind can see it's appeal
Frank openly said - only one narrative (socialism, marxism, social marxism) is being taught on campuses today. When that is juxtaposed against the fraud of the CMO market / big short, legitimate structural racism through 1965 (Jim Crow), etc., escalating health care costs, escalating education costs and the relative success through 2015 of the Northern EU countries, a younger mind can see it's appeal
Yeah. This is certainly the way I see the world. Weak men are the most dangerous animals on the planet. They will smile to your face, and stab you in the back. Strong, confident, masculine men do not shoot up schools. They do not harm women. Weak men are the devils seed for social chaos
Weak men create hard times, as evidenced in our current lived experience.
strong men create good times, we are currently here, good times create weak men, wea re also here, weak men create bad times, we are not here yet.....
How is it that the weak men are able to convince the women they are right and usurp the power from the big strong guys?
Are the strong guys just not very smart?
Are the strong guys just not very smart?
Weasels are clever and strong men don’t watch their ankles they are defending against the lions coming for their woman. It was always the weasels and unsuccessful that caused trouble for stars like me in corporate America.
You may have a point. We gave women the right to vote. WTF were we thinking?
Implies that the women are gullible and easily influenced. And dumb.
Is that truth?
I wouldn’t say dumb. However, as unpopular as it is in modern culture, I do believe that on the whole men are more logic centered while women are emotional. I love women. My mom is a women. My wife is a women. I have 2 daughters. There’s no hate in it, I just think the genders are built for different roles and character traits. I think society suffers when we get out of our natural lanes. In short, yes, I think women are more easily influenced.
no, the makeup of the party would be different as would its focus. same with the pubs. i dont think 98% of the public should vote. at the very very least you should have to be a net income tax payer. that would drop it to maybe 90% that cannot vote.
Fine but the leftwing democrat jackasses that get elected these days wouldn't have a chance. Trans would not be playing against women.
LOL, I think maybe its time to start a "burqa" business, seems it might have a bright future here.
So you think men and women are the same? There arent traits that are more natural to specific gender. Women, on the whole, arent more agreeable than men? Interesting
That’s likely true. Although the trans thing is just to trigger the sheep until they pass out. It has value.
More agreeable? Have you EVER seen any episode of Real Housewives? 😂😂😂😂
I said women on the whole. I have never seen any "Real Housewives" shows, however, I assume these are modern western women. Modern western women do not represent women on the whole. In fact, modern western women make a up a tiny fraction of women historically. Im pretty sure that women being more agreeable then men is not controversial at all. I dont think women being more emotion driven then men is constroversial. Its a self evident truth.
more agreeable and more emotional seem to be at odds with common sense and what i have witnessed in life.
I would say that if you make decisions on emotion, and tend to be more agreeable...that makes you easier to convince. That is my arguement. Its not a bad thing. I think men and women are built to compliment each other to best serve the nuclear family unit.
they are certainly more prone to accepting a more emotional argument, that can have merit if its governed by a man...
😀If women are easier to convince, why does Trump have such a hard time convincing them?
Because they are emotion driven. The right is driven by rational thought. The democrats have figured that they just need to make an emotional plea. “Ahhh, your no longer going to be able to kill your babies”
Ok you lost me here the right is not driven by rational thought. There is nothing rational about religion. Nothing. It’s all emotion, 117% emotion
Funny. The left IS a religion. It requires its members to adhere to strange beliefs such as men can become women and women can become men. It has human sacrifice in the form of baby killing in the womb. Finally, like bizarre 3rd world religions, it includes genital mutilation.
Seems like you are arguing against you own point with this statement.
No the fringe left is but the normal democrats are rational thinkers they don’t take marching orders from the invisible man.
I dont follow. Democrats make emotional pitches. Women go for it, because they are emotional. Are you denying that women are emotion driven, while men are more rational? If so, then make the arguement. You come off as a "weak male that stays home with women and children" type.
in general men are more rational, but its not the spread it used to be.
Probably true. Women are becoming more masculine, and men more feminine. As I said before, ultimatly I think this leads to social disorder and unhappiness. The genders are built for complimentary roles to support the nuclear family unit. We need to stay in our own gender lanes and get things back on track in terms of raising children with a half a clue as to what they are supposed to be doing.
