I think masks helped, at the margin. N95 masks are the ones that are truly effective. Cloth masks are debated as noted above. Again, I think they generally helped, but how much...? The answer there is that in January, you saw the Biden administration start to double mask with a medical mask underneath and cloth mask. (we did the same) What did this mean? Cloth masks were and are likely not that effective.
On the other hand, one piece of data is that the flu virus was nearly eradicated. Ask any Children's Hospital CFO what the largest impact to their revenue and OI line was and they will tell you that their ERs were empty from not seeing flu patients (and also trauma as fewer sports were being played). Masking played a positive role in that.
Trump could have leveraged masks to his advantage:
- Continuing to drive the Lab Leak theory
- Call Masks as "patriotic" in the US' fight versus China
- Support targeted masking in indoor areas
- Print millions of MAGA2020 and US flag masks, give it out to everyone
Trump is a marketer, at his core (and a very good one). He had 73M+ of face real estate and chose not to use it.
A missed opportunity.
On a personal level, I travel (used to travel) a good deal for my role. Going forward on planes, I will continue to mask and even double mask. My wife and family will do the same, but that is a personal choice. I would hope that others would do the same - if they are sick and still decide to travel.
Now, with Pelosi continuing to mandate masks in the House Chamber, that is her mistake and is decidedly anti-science. The Vaccines work - phenomenally well. 90% of the chamber is vaccinated and the others have had the virus. Even if someone does not want to Vaccinate because it's under EUA, then that is their decision. They can choose to get vaccinated, they can choose to wear a mask or they can choose to have their primary physician on speed dial to get a Monoclonal Anti-body treatment should they be part of the 1-2% of cases that become severe.
Happy Tuesday, all.