Typical Dim behavior.
- Thread starter theswamp15
- Start date
Hypocritical and also idiots. Grandstanding about something they know nothing about.
Um, DC mandate is for indoor public settings. Like a grocery store, movie theater, etc. The wedding was not open to the public, and therefore an indoor private setting and exempt from the rule. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.
Once again the point flew over your head. Stick to the spreadsheets
Whatever helps you sleep at night. I didn’t realize covid only spread in public settings and not private events. Must be sCiEnCe
Nice attempt to move the goalposts there, but fail. She followed the mandate, end of story.
Sounds like the mandate really follows science. Everyone knows private massless parties don’t let covid spread. Only public ones for us peons allow it to spread.
So that took all of 11 seconds, Mr Lazy. Note the part about indoor public settings.
This includes any business or establishment open to members of the public
Since it was a private party it wasn't open to members of the public. Therefore, within the mask mandate.
There were hundreds of people from different households all together indoors.
Keep pushing that rope bud.
So, you are unclear of the difference between what public and private means?
Public means random people come and go freely. Private means a specific group of people together.
Learn the difference and get back to me.
Why would either of them be involved in a discussion of DC mask mandates? If you don't know the discussion, keep your man pleaser shut.
😂😂😂😂
Kudos for creativity, you’re learning padawan
However, you’d cry foul if Trump held a private gathering in DC and no one wore masks
So what’s the spirit of the rule?
Tell me how these two scenarios are different from an infectious disease standpoint:
1) 300 people from different households are in a wedding indoors
2) 300 people are in an auditorium at a concert
Similar threads
