ADVERTISEMENT

So obama judge throws out NV case says he's seen no evidence of fraud

Trump team apparently provided 20 binders full of evidence. But obama judge and Hiden lawyer agreed that their evidence wasn't evidence.

Seeing conflicting info, that may mean onto the SC.
You know the fix is in when direct testimony is refuted as evidence. I'm of the opinion Martial Law is the next logical step to invalidate THE FRAUD.
 
Is there time for all this to make it to the Supreme Court? What time is it the Supreme Court is not here these cases quickly? Seems like they can run the clock out on this before the game really gets going.
 
Is there time for all this to make it to the Supreme Court? What time is it the Supreme Court is not here these cases quickly? Seems like they can run the clock out on this before the game really gets going.
There is still hope that the elections in the states in question will have their electors not able to cast their votes.........and it goes to the House. If Hiden can't get to 270.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gator1776
You know the fix is in when direct testimony is refuted as evidence. I'm of the opinion Martial Law is the next logical step to invalidate THE FRAUD.

I'm kinda wondering if they aren't purposely getting these cases in front of obama judges to fast track to the SC?
 
I'm kinda wondering if they aren't purposely getting these cases in front of obama judges to fast track to the SC?
Yes............the problem with that is that Roberts is Chief Justice. Will they hear it? Roberts has had a mafia induced decapitated horse head in his bed since Obozocare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco
My understanding is that they need 4 judges to agree to hear the case. They should get that if it's the case.
Let's hope so. Thank you ACB. Take some names and kick some asses. Remember............she laughed in the Dimtards faces when they asked her if she would recuse herself from any election issues. She's no Jeff Sessions,
 
I know there was a John Roberts on the flight logs, but was it confirmed to be him?
In all honesty I’m not sure. It makes sense since he “was on the flight logs” and sides with the libtards. For being a “conservative” he sure rules very liberally.

I heard a rumor about Scalia and Roberts, haven’t checked into it yet but interesting none the less.
 
In all honesty I’m not sure. It makes sense since he “was on the flight logs” and sides with the libtards. For being a “conservative” he sure rules very liberally.

I heard a rumor about Scalia and Roberts, haven’t checked into it yet but interesting none the less.
Roberts probably won't have an autopsy either.
 
True. The first rule of "The Steal" is that the media doesn't talk about it.
This country needs a giant overhaul in regards to media. If Trump gets elected and he gets the 230 revoked, it will be interesting to see the lawsuits against Google, Twatter and Fakebook.
 
Yes............the problem with that is that Roberts is Chief Justice. Will they hear it? Roberts has had a mafia induced decapitated horse head in his bed since Obozocare.
Yes Roberts can’t block if 4 agree to hear it. He isn’t the king of the court.
 
Trump team apparently provided 20 binders full of evidence. But obama judge and Hiden lawyer agreed that their evidence wasn't evidence.

Seeing conflicting info, that may mean onto the SC.
It was dismissed with prejudice. That means it’s over at the state level in NV (I believe).

Filing it as a new case in Federal court is still an option.

Do not be surprised if the SC doesn’t merge cases here. Lots of smoke that Alito met with the Trump legal team to discuss their complaints and has set the first hearing deadline for the day after safe harbor. It isn’t an accident and may mean that he knows he has the support of other justices.
 
Yeah forget about the evidence of 40k duplicated ballots and 10k people not living there that voted. Those numbers alone flip it to Trump.
Nevada right? That was a screaming fraud months BEFORE the election. Rush called that one back in the summer.
 
It was dismissed with prejudice. That means it’s over at the state level in NV (I believe).

Filing it as a new case in Federal court is still an option.

Do not be surprised if the SC doesn’t merge cases here. Lots of smoke that Alito met with the Trump legal team to discuss their complaints and has set the first hearing deadline for the day after safe harbor. It isn’t an accident and may mean that he knows he has the support of other justices.

PA case headed to SC and Alito has told PA to respond by the 9th, the day after Safe Harbor.
 
It was dismissed with prejudice. That means it’s over at the state level in NV (I believe).

Filing it as a new case in Federal court is still an option.

Do not be surprised if the SC doesn’t merge cases here. Lots of smoke that Alito met with the Trump legal team to discuss their complaints and has set the first hearing deadline for the day after safe harbor. It isn’t an accident and may mean that he knows he has the support of other justices.

So if I remember correctly, when the judges were recently re-assigned, the judges got the circuit for each state:

PA - Alito
GA - Thomas
MI - Kavanaugh
WI - ACB

ACB and Kavanaugh might have been flipped. But I remember thinking at the time of the assigment, that was the 4 states that looked most likely to have cases go to the SC.

But they would need to combine at least 3 state cases (flip 3 states), or is that the point of combining state cases to make them into one FEDERAL case, which could decide entire election?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT