What cases does the SDNY have jurisdiction over?
epstein?
clinton foundation?
@bradleygator are you awake?
Justice is coming. Dems circling the wagons.
Ousted US Attorney for SDNY refuses to step down
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
What cases does the SDNY have jurisdiction over?
epstein?
clinton foundation?
@bradleygator are you awake?
Justice is coming. Dems circling the wagons.
“Over two decades, Trump borrowed more than $2bn from Deutsche. In 2008, he defaulted on a $45m loan repayment and sued the bank. Its private wealth division in New York subsequently loaned Trump a further $300m – a move that bemused insiders and which has yet to be fully explained.”
“I will step down when... an appointee is confirmed by the Senate... until then... investigations move forward.”
SOP. Their suggestions will be dropped in the trash where they belong, and then patriot Jay Clayton will take over.
Sounds like the dems funnelled all the cases that would expose their corruption through the SDNY, where their good ole boys could protect them from seeing the light of day.
For instance, why haven't they moved on the epstein case? You told us that he had the goods on Orange Man Bad, gonna bring Trump down!
New Sheriff in Town. And right on cue, the libs want to impeach boogeyman Barr.
Then why are the dems on Twitter shitting themselves and demanding that Barr be impeached?
Think yall skeered now? Keep watching...
Translation: "Everyone in my office is on OT paper-shredding detail this weekend. Round the clock boys, Justice never sleeps!"
Looks like Barr just put a stop to it. Now maybe all these investigations that the dems had buried will move forward.
The Rule of Law wins! MAGA!
Notice they never mention he was SUPPOSED to be investigating epstein, clinton foundation and ukraine. Sheep like @bradleygator never think to question the talking points fed to them by their media overlords.
Justice wins. Eat it, dems.
Trump should have done what is normal when a new President takes office. They clean house by firing and/or reassigning the former President's cronies, replacing them with their own appointees. IMO, not doing so was a Trump critical error that has cost him dearly. The Ambassadors to Russia, Ukraine, and China would have gone first if it was me. Then the heads of the FBI, CIA, JD, and some other federal bureau organizations would have been next.
For the Congress to question or challenge all of Trump's appointees, would be like Trump wanting to challenge and give his okay for all staff hiring's of every member of Congress. Total BS that would be, both ways....
There are a couple of dozen hold-overs that I'd fire today, along with a few others like Dr. Faulty.... --- And he also should pull some of those with WH press credentials. If Trumps press meetings are televised and he also uses social media to get his word out, then I don't need CNN, MSDNC, etc. telling me what I should take away from what he's said, after they do their biased editing of it.
For the Congress to question or challenge all of Trump's appointees, would be like Trump wanting to challenge and give his okay for all staff hiring's of every member of Congress. Total BS that would be, both ways....
There are a couple of dozen hold-overs that I'd fire today, along with a few others like Dr. Faulty....
--- And he also should pull some of those with WH press credentials. If Trumps press meetings are televised and he also uses social media to get his word out, then I don't need CNN, MSDNC, etc. telling me what I should take away from what he's said, after they do their biased editing of it.
Last edited:
Well, well, well....
https://justthenews.com/accountabil...osecutor-was-given-biden-ukraine-allegations#
"In addition, Cummins told Berman that Lutsenko had evidence that a ledger found in Ukraine in 2016 alleging to show payments to Manafort from a Russian-backed political party in Ukraine was doctored and the U.S. knew the evidence was corrupted. The emergence of the ledger caused Manafort to resign as Trump’s campaign chairman in August 2016, and eventually led to his conviction on money laundering and tax charges.
“The second allegation above is that the Embassy and FBI willfully pressured Ukrainian officials to falsify evidence to be leaked to the media about Manafort to affect the outcome of the 2016 election,” Cummins wrote Berman.
Cummins said in an interview he had one phone call and four email contacts with Berman in October 2018 about the Ukrainian matter, but the prosecutor’s office never took Lutsenko up on his offer to come to Washington and lay out his evidence.
“I never heard from them again,” Cummins said of Berman’s office. “It was an opportunity for the Justice Department to address these concerns privately, and who knows how history would have turned out had the SDNY simply followed up.”
Berman, instead, would eventually indict two associates of Giuliani on campaign finance and other charges after they tried to help the former New York City mayor and Trump lawyer publicize the Ukraine prosecutors' concerns. (One of the indicted associates, Lev Parnas, worked as a translator and interview facilitator for this reporter on a handful of Ukraine interviews in 2019, but prosecutors do not allege he did anything wrong in that work.)
James Margolin, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in New York, declined comment Monday when asked about the Cummins overture in 2018."
@bradleygator are you awake? Looks like dems had their own 'fixer' in place to kill investigations that would expose your party's corruption.
What happens when a blockcade is removed? Full steam ahead.
"Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime friend and close confidante of Jeffrey Epstein, was arrested Thursday in New Hampshire and charged in Manhattan federal court with helping the deceased financier run an underage sex-trafficking ring that stretched from New York to London.
In an unsealed indictment signed by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, prosecutors in the Southern District of New York accused Maxwell, formerly a prominent British socialite, of befriending girls as young as 14 to engage in illegal sex acts with Epstein and then lying under oath about her involvement."
https://www.law.com/newyorklawjourn...sex-trafficking-ring/?slreturn=20200602115208
Popcorn is served, with a side of crow for @bradleygator
Isn't it odd? As soon as the dem is fired, suddenly there's movement in the epstein case, which SDNY is handling.
What a coincidence. Or as Q would say "There are no coincidences".
It will be interesting to see which clinton gets in more hot water over this. If they go deep enough, it will be interesting to watch.
