Number Don’t Lie

[Ncgatr1]

I had an engineering professor tell me once, “numbers don’t lie, but people do”. It’s tough to hide massive election fraud when they make it this easy for the numbers guys. The election in PA is completely unacceptable, and the dimwits that defend this crap in here are nothing more than ignorant sheep. You can’t defend the indefensible. Prove Mr. Piton is wrong.

Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: 'Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome'

Bobby Piton Bobby Piton, the mathematician who testified at the Arizona voter fraud hearing dropped a bombshell this weekend. Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[BillCutting4585]

I had an engineering professor tell me once, “numbers don’t lie, but people do”. It’s tough to hide massive election fraud when they make it this easy for the numbers guys. The election in PA is completely unacceptable, and the dimwits that defend this crap in here are nothing more than ignorant sheep. You can’t defend the indefensible. Prove Mr. Pitton is wrong.

Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: 'Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome'

Bobby Piton Bobby Piton, the mathematician who testified at the Arizona voter fraud hearing dropped a bombshell this weekend. Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Their excuse is that the article comes from The Gateway Pundit so it’s right wing BS. They won’t refute the actual article itself.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Odd. Because @LizardGrad89 just said he had never been wrong here. And @sadgator agreed with him.

Huh.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I am beginning to think this story will reach a point where the sheep have to choose between backing the American President, or China.

And I suspect they will back China.

 

[jfegaly]

Odd. Because @LizardGrad89 just said he had never been wrong here. And @sadgator agreed with him.

Huh.

lizard has zero character and even less integrity. So theres that

 

[gator1776]

lizard has zero character and even less integrity. So theres that

@LizardGrad89 is a parasite, he lives off the hard work of others and is fine with it.

 

[jfegaly]

I am beginning to think this story will reach a point where the sheep have to choose between backing the American President, or China.

And I suspect they will back China.

they have already. They are backing Beijing biden

 

[BSC911]

Statistics don’t prove fraud. You need to find actual cases. So far, Zip and Pip, other than a few Trumpers who were caught.

————

Can something be statistically impossible?

Does it make sense when people say "statistically impossible"?

math.stackexchange.com

General probability theory does not have a good way of making sense of "impossible" or "necessity". Having a probability of 00does not mean something cannot happen, and having a probability of 11 does not mean that something must happen. To explain this with a metaphor from geometry, consider the notion of area. The area of nothing is 00, but so is the area of a single point. In that sense, the notion of area cannot distinguish between nothing and that which is "infinitely small".

Similarly, when trying to applying probability theory to problems that have infinitely many outcomes, the probability of an event can be zero even if it is possible, so long as there are infinitely many other possibilities that are just as likely (or some similar situation). When it comes down to it, the real number line does not have infinitely small numbers, and since probability theory uses real numbers, these events can only be assigned a probability of 00.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

they have already. They are backing Beijing biden

They are just following their media overlord's orders.

There will come a time when they will have to choose for themselves. Most sheep do not have a good track record in that regard.

 

[jfegaly]

Statistics don’t prove fraud. You need to find actual cases. So far, Zip and Pip, other than a few Trumpers who were caught.

————

Can something be statistically impossible?

Does it make sense when people say "statistically impossible"?

math.stackexchange.com

General probability theory does not have a good way of making sense of "impossible" or "necessity". Having a probability of 00does not mean something cannot happen, and having a probability of 11 does not mean that something must happen. To explain this with a metaphor from geometry, consider the notion of area. The area of nothing is 00, but so is the area of a single point. In that sense, the notion of area cannot distinguish between nothing and that which is "infinitely small".

Similarly, when trying to applying probability theory to problems that have infinitely many outcomes, the probability of an event can be zero even if it is possible, so long as there are infinitely many other possibilities that are just as likely (or some similar situation). When it comes down to it, the real number line does not have infinitely small numbers, and since probability theory uses real numbers, these events can only be assigned a probability of 00.

you realize how ignorant you sound while trying to sound intelligent? Good grief get back in front of the fryer

 

[IrishPokerDog]

Statistics don’t prove fraud. You need to find actual cases. So far, Zip and Pip, other than a few Trumpers who were caught.

————

statistics is proof in a massive number of court cases each year. To argue against such is to deny the applicability of ALL DNA evidence ever used

 

[BSC911]

statistics is proof in a massive number of court cases each year. To argue against such is to deny the applicability of ALL DNA evidence ever used

OK. I’ll give you that. But the statistical basis for some of these claims is very suspect.

 

[IrishPokerDog]

OK. I’ll give you that. But the statistical basis for some of these claims is very suspect.

I haven’t seen all the claims, and you may be correctly referencing some BS claims, but some numbers I’ve seen are impossible to discount

 

[BSC911]

I haven’t seen all the claims, and you may be correctly referencing some BS claims, but some numbers I’ve seen are impossible to discount

I believe they are a function of voter harvesting. Which is perfectly legal as long as they are from qualified voters.

 

[jfegaly]

I believe they are a function of voter harvesting. Which is perfectly legal as long as they are from qualified voters.

lol. Smdh.

 

[BSC911]

lol. Smdh.

Nothing to add. As usual. Worst poster OTB.

 

[jfegaly]

I believe they are a function of voter harvesting. Which is perfectly legal as long as they are from qualified voters.

further proof the election was stolen. Anyone who believes for a minute that ballot harvesting was on the up And up is either fos, or doesn’t care. I suggest @BSC911 google a little better. The devil (fraud) is in the details. Go ahead, look at some of the restrictions california removed. It’s a joke to think we will ever have fair and honest elections again, and some of you buffoon are ignorant enough to celebrate it while not realizing you forever will be insignificant in elections

 

[jfegaly]

Nothing to add. As usual. Worst poster OTB.

man in the mirror comes to mind for you fry guy.

shall we drop trouser and compare likes?

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

I believe they are a function of voter harvesting. Which is perfectly legal as long as they are from qualified voters.

From what I have been told its illegal in Ga regardless of status of voter

 

[BSC911]

From what I have been told its illegal in Ga regardless of status of voter

I’ll defer that question to those more knowledgeable in GA law than I am.