ADVERTISEMENT

kamala harris says if elected President, Congress has 100 days to pass new gun control laws

GhostOfMatchesMalone

GhostOfMatchesMalone

Ring of Honor
Oct 1, 2012
36,902
47,735
113
or she will sign an Executive Order.

This is how President Trump is destroying the democratic party. The dems are so desperate to appeal to their donors (who hate our great President) and to keep the money coming in, that they are continuing to move even further to the Left in order to curry favor with them.

They are now literally running on taking guns away from lawful owners.

When your enemy is busy making mistakes, don't interrupt them.
 
Kamala is not going to have to worry about being prez. Nor is Cory. Unfair as it is, Barack ruined the road for both. John Blake and Charlie Strong ruined any hope for football head coaches at Texas and Oklahoma for at least a generation. Sorry. That's just the way it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Curmudgeon and nail1988
sadgator said:
sadgator carries a bat...
Click to expand...

And even if you make every gun on the planet illegal to own, criminals will still own them.

So you won't be changing behavior for a single criminal on the planet, and you will be punishing EVERY SINGLE law-abiding person on the PLANET.

You literally support making it easier for criminals to hurt and kill law-abiding citizens with guns. That is mind-bogglingly stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GADAWGinIraq
sadgator said:
No...it wasn’t...it was created for muskets...but you know that...
Click to expand...

No, it was created so that Americans wouldn't be slaves to our government. And sadly, you don't know that.

Banning guns does three things:

1 - It greatly impacts a law-abiding citizen's ability to defend themselves, especially against a criminal with a gun that intends to do them harm.

2 - It empowers criminals by making it much easier for them to harm law-abiding citizens

3 - It makes the government responsible for defending citizens against criminals with guys.


It's truly scary how little liberals know of American history. Our Founding Fathers knew how important the Second Amendment was because they understood that if government and criminals had all the guns, then good people would be slaves to both.

The majority of this country is rural, not urban. Many rural counties have only one and some have NO full-time police officers patroling. So in many cases, if a gun crime is reported, it could be 30-60 mins at least before the ONE cop car in that county can respond.

Even emotional liberals know that the criminal with a gun can easily kill that defenseless family in 30-60 mins and be long gone.

They don't care, they just hate guns that much. They think emotionally, not critically. Just look above where sad says his baseball bat will protect him against a criminal with a gun.

It boggles the mind...
 
  • Like
Reactions: GADAWGinIraq and IrishPokerDog
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
No, it was created so that Americans wouldn't be slaves to our government. And sadly, you don't know that.

Banning guns does three things:

1 - It greatly impacts a law-abiding citizen's ability to defend themselves, especially against a criminal with a gun that intends to do them harm.

2 - It empowers criminals by making it much easier for them to harm law-abiding citizens

3 - It makes the government responsible for defending citizens against criminals with guys.


It's truly scary how little liberals know of American history. Our Founding Fathers knew how important the Second Amendment was because they understood that if government and criminals had all the guns, then good people would be slaves to both.

The majority of this country is rural, not urban. Many rural counties have only one and some have NO full-time police officers patroling. So in many cases, if a gun crime is reported, it could be 30-60 mins at least before the ONE cop car in that county can respond.

Even emotional liberals know that the criminal with a gun can easily kill that defenseless family in 30-60 mins and be long gone.

They don't care, they just hate guns that much. They think emotionally, not critically. Just look above where sad says his baseball bat will protect him against a criminal with a gun.

It boggles the mind...
Click to expand...

Stalin, Mao. Hitler, Pol Pot all loved gun control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GADAWGinIraq
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
No, it was created so that Americans wouldn't be slaves to our government. And sadly, you don't know that.

Banning guns does three things:

1 - It greatly impacts a law-abiding citizen's ability to defend themselves, especially against a criminal with a gun that intends to do them harm.

2 - It empowers criminals by making it much easier for them to harm law-abiding citizens

3 - It makes the government responsible for defending citizens against criminals with guys.


It's truly scary how little liberals know of American history. Our Founding Fathers knew how important the Second Amendment was because they understood that if government and criminals had all the guns, then good people would be slaves to both.

The majority of this country is rural, not urban. Many rural counties have only one and some have NO full-time police officers patroling. So in many cases, if a gun crime is reported, it could be 30-60 mins at least before the ONE cop car in that county can respond.

Even emotional liberals know that the criminal with a gun can easily kill that defenseless family in 30-60 mins and be long gone.

They don't care, they just hate guns that much. They think emotionally, not critically. Just look above where sad says his baseball bat will protect him against a criminal with a gun.

It boggles the mind...
Click to expand...

John Lott, who wrote More Guns, Less Crime, a one time sniveling liberal finally caught on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IrishPokerDog, GADAWGinIraq and GhostOfMatchesMalone
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
Notice he thought it was no big deal that the progressives said 'easter worshippers' and refused to call them Christians.

To your point.
Click to expand...
It’s called reading comprehension and context dude...please...but that doesn’t fit your narrative of painting Obama as some Godless demon so you’re not even willing to be objective by considering the actual intended context of a freakin’ tweet...

You guys infer outlandish conclusions about things that aren’t even implied and run with them like they are gospel (yes pun intended).

And get off it...sadgator is a Catholic...surprise...

Albeit admittedly not a very good one...
 
sadgator said:
It’s called reading comprehension and context dude...please...but that doesn’t fit your narrative of painting Obama as some Godless demon so you’re not even willing to be objective by considering the actual intended context of a freakin’ tweet...

You guys infer outlandish conclusions about things that aren’t even implied and run with them like they are gospel (yes pun intended).

And get off it...sadgator is a Catholic...surprise...

Albeit admittedly not a very good one...
Click to expand...

Nah you're just apologizing for obama.

Lefties got their panties all in a wad over terrorism in New Zealand, but have not a word to say when radical muslims kill Christians.

We know why, bro. Don't worry.
 
Think about it logically...sadgator knows it’s very difficult for you given your hatred...

Obama did not have to tweet AT ALL. The tweet is in support of those killed (Christians).

Individuals who worship Jesus on Easter (A Christian Holiday) are engaging in the action of worshipping on Easter. Those people are therefore; Easter worshippers...[insert sound of recognition “aaaaahhhhh...”]

Try not to let your brain explode when you finally get it...
 
sadgator said:
Think about it logically...sadgator knows it’s very difficult for you given your hatred...

Obama did not have to tweet AT ALL. The tweet is in support of those killed (Christians).

Individuals who worship Jesus on Easter (A Christian Holiday) are engaging in the action of worshipping on Easter. Those people are therefore; Easter worshippers...

Try not to let your brain explode when you finally get it...
Click to expand...

Christians worship Jesus every day, not just on Easter.

I was not a Wednesday worshipper today, I was a Christian worshipper.



Notice the difference? Why didn't obama say he was standing with the CHRISTIAN community when he tweeted about the bombings in Sri Lanka?

Why was it 'Easter worshippers'?

Because a lot of people worship on Easter, not just Christians.

Try not to let your brain explode when you finally get it....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Curmudgeon and GADAWGinIraq
sadgator said:
Think about it logically...sadgator knows it’s very difficult for you given your hatred...

Obama did not have to tweet AT ALL. The tweet is in support of those killed (Christians).

Individuals who worship Jesus on Easter (A Christian Holiday) are engaging in the action of worshipping on Easter. Those people are therefore; Easter worshippers...[insert sound of recognition “aaaaahhhhh...”]

Try not to let your brain explode when you finally get it...
Click to expand...
To many denominations they find the words Easter worshiper's to imply they only worship on Easter Sunday. To me, it is not splitting hairs because I worship Jesus every day, but the Resurrection is especially a time to reflect on the sacrifice for our transgressions. A real Christian would be there no matter what Sunday it was and shouldn't need to be reminded of the sacrifice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GADAWGinIraq
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Capt Ron 1

Just a reminder.......

Replies
121
Views
7K
The Parking Lot
Capt Ron 1
Capt Ron 1
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back