Hypocrisy 101 from my right friends

[kalimgoodman]

Ill start off by saying I truly don't care either way but I am curious as to why there isn't any outrage from the Republicans on this board about Ginni Thomas?

You guys have plenty of outrage about Hunter. I don't think a person should be judged by what their family do BUT you guys do, so...

A person on the Supreme Court is engaging in situations that will be argued in front of their spouse isn't corruption? Thomas was the only judge that voted against release documents that his wife communication was apart of. That isn't concerning? Like zero threads? Seriously?

It's not that I care but you guys once again prove to me that you have zero morals.

It's rather sad at this point.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Speaking of hypocrisy, you tend to make excuses for anything and everything on the left and do the exact opposite for everything on the right.

So sure, we can talk about hypocrisy if you like...but you won’t be standing on the moral high ground.

 

[kalimgoodman]

Speaking of hypocrisy, you tend to make excuses for anything and everything on the left and do the exact opposite for everything on the right.

So sure, we can talk about hypocrisy if you like...but you won’t be standing on the moral high ground.

Name a time when I showed hypocrisy? I'm constantly calling you guys out for having no morals.

 

[LinksGator]

Maybe we could have a "group hearing" with Ginni, Hunter, The Big Guy(he could be in his basemnt),
Michael Avenatti, Meadows, and Adam Schiff. Hook them all to lie detectors and shoot everyone who is lying.

So the son of the vice president can steal money from the Chinese and the Ukrainians, use more drugs that a small hospital, give his Dad Joey 10%; but a few emails from Ginni and we are the effing hypocrites?

 

[Orangeclad]

Speaking of hypocrisy, you tend to make excuses for anything and everything on the left and do the exact opposite for everything on the right.

So sure, we can talk about hypocrisy if you like...but you won’t be standing on the moral high ground.

His first sentence is an effing lie. Quote I'll start off by saying I truly don't care either way, unquote. Of course he cares either way. You want proof? Has he started a thread about Hunter Biden's laptop and the corruption involved with he and his father? Hell no. There's your hypocrisy he denies for himself while hiding behind the lie that he doesn't care either way. He cares ONE way and it's a big left hand turn.

 

[instaGATOR]

As always,,, he's still killingagoodman....

 

[kalimgoodman]

His first sentence is an effing lie. Quote I'll start off by saying I truly don't care either way, unquote. Of course he cares either way. You want proof? Has he started a thread about Hunter Biden's laptop and the corruption involved with he and his father? Hell no. There's your hypocrisy he denies for himself while hiding behind the lie that he doesn't care either way. He cares ONE way and it's a big left hand turn.

No, the point is you guys CLAIM to care about this stuff. Yet when it's on the right...crickets.

I don't even fault you because you already admitted that you are a biased and unfair. So you're exempted from this conversation.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Name a time when I showed hypocrisy? I'm constantly calling you guys out for having no morals.

It's constant. I'm a bit stunned that you don't see it.

It's always a "yea but..."

Sometimes the "yea but" simply defends a Democrats actions.

Other times the "yea but" excuses the Democrats actions by comparing it to "that one time a Republican did something bad."

Still other times the "yea but" is merely to question the motives from either party with a healthy dose of left-wing spin.

Yes, you call others out...but you are ABSOLUTELY guilty of the same.

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

Brandon is probably a bit more involved in Hunter corruption than Hunter traffic tickets.

 

[instaGATOR]

So Bama, you're saying that killingagoodman is a real YEA BUTT, pretty much all the time.... 🤗

 

[kalimgoodman]

It's constant. I'm a bit stunned that you don't see it.

It's always a "yea but..."

Sometimes the "yea but" simply defends a Democrats actions.

Other times the "yea but" excuses the Democrats actions by comparing it to "that one time a Republican did something bad."

Still other times the "yea but" is merely to question the motives from either party with a healthy dose of left-wing spin.

Yes, you call others out...but you are ABSOLUTELY guilty of the same.

When I say "yea but" it's me calling you guys out for bitching about something that the dems did, when Republicans have previously done the same or similar things. So you provided an example of me calling you guys out, thanks for confirming that.

I have never went against my morals for any person, party or politician and never will.

If i dislike something, then I will call out whomever.

Now provide an example of something that I bitched about and ignored when the dems did it...

 

[Orangeclad]

Speaking of hypocrisy, you tend to make excuses for anything and everything on the left and do the exact opposite for everything on the right.

So sure, we can talk about hypocrisy if you like...but you won’t be standing on the moral high ground.

Ask him if he has started ONE thread criticizing Biden or the dems in the 14 months Biden's been president. You would think that logically speaking, there would be a lot to criticize just looking at the horrible poll numbers and from somebody claiming to be an Independent. You know damn well that if Trump was president now, there would be lots of critical threads from him. He hides behind this holier than thou facade of moral highground and has fooled himself into thinking he's not guilty of what he accuses others of.

 

[NavigatorII]

Ill start off by saying I truly don't care either way but I am curious as to why there isn't any outrage from the Republicans on this board about Ginni Thomas?

You guys have plenty of outrage about Hunter. I don't think a person should be judged by what their family do BUT you guys do, so...

A person on the Supreme Court is engaging in situations that will be argued in front of their spouse isn't corruption? Thomas was the only judge that voted against release documents that his wife communication was apart of. That isn't concerning? Like zero threads? Seriously?

It's not that I care but you guys once again prove to me that you have zero morals.

It's rather sad at this point.

I'll start with "who the hell is Ginni Thomas" for $500 Alex? 🤣 If you are going to start a red flag thread, at least post a link to the context.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Ill start off by saying I truly don't care either way but I am curious as to why there isn't any outrage from the Republicans on this board about Ginni Thomas?

You guys have plenty of outrage about Hunter. I don't think a person should be judged by what their family do BUT you guys do, so...

A person on the Supreme Court is engaging in situations that will be argued in front of their spouse isn't corruption? Thomas was the only judge that voted against release documents that his wife communication was apart of. That isn't concerning? Like zero threads? Seriously?

It's not that I care but you guys once again prove to me that you have zero morals.

It's rather sad at this point.

No idea why any sane person would think the situation as you described it is hypocritical. Either you are ignorant of the facts, or this is simply another bad troll attempt.

Next.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Now provide an example of something that I bitched about and ignored when the dems did it...

Just one?

You cried about the Trump kids cause libber blogs told you they were mean, but when we actually found evidence of Hunter's drug abuse and corruption in Ukraine, you said "I don't care about Hunter'.

You claimed that 'black people knew that Trump was racist', but when we had multiple examples of Hiden actually being racist, you ignored when he did what you claimed (but could not prove) that Trump did.

Want more or we good?

 

[Orangeclad]

Just one?

You cried about the Trump kids cause libber blogs told you they were mean, but when we actually found evidence of Hunter's drug abuse and corruption in Ukraine, you said "I don't care about Hunter'.

You claimed that 'black people knew that Trump was racist', but when we had multiple examples of Hiden actually being racist, you ignored when he did what you claimed (but could not prove) that Trump did.

Want more or we good?

Ding ding ding, we have a winner.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Ding ding ding, we have a winner.

He's obviously trolling. I will never understand why the dems that post here think lying is a good troll.

 

[BamaFan1137]

When I say "yea but" it's me calling you guys out for bitching about something that the dems did, when Republicans have previously done the same or similar things. So you provided an example of me calling you guys out, thanks for confirming that.

I have never went against my morals for any person, party or politician and never will.

If i dislike something, then I will call out whomever.

Now provide an example of something that I bitched about and ignored when the dems did it...

...sigh...

Your yea buts are no different than anyone's yea buts no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise.

You make excuses for political bedfellows and then call people out if you think they're doing likewise. I've pointed out specific circumstances in the past...I'll do it again...and then you'll explain how "it's different."

But no problem, I'll do it again.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Just one?

You cried about the Trump kids cause libber blogs told you they were mean, but when we actually found evidence of Hunter's drug abuse and corruption in Ukraine, you said "I don't care about Hunter'.

You claimed that 'black people knew that Trump was racist', but when we had multiple examples of Hiden actually being racist, you ignored when he did what you claimed (but could not prove) that Trump did.

Want more or we good?

Two excellent examples. Thank you.

 

[kalimgoodman]

...sigh...

Your yea buts are no different than anyone's yea buts no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise.

You make excuses for political bedfellows and then call people out if you think they're doing likewise. I've pointed out specific circumstances in the past...I'll do it again...and then you'll explain how "it's different."

But no problem, I'll do it again.

Like I said, name it or go away.

 

[kalimgoodman]

I'll start with "who the hell is Ginni Thomas" for $500 Alex? 🤣 If you are going to start a red flag thread, at least post a link to the context.

The fact that you don't know who Ginni Thomas is speaks LOUDLY to your bubble.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

The fact that you don't know who Ginni Thomas is speaks LOUDLY to your bubble.

Without googling it, give us the names of the spouses of:

Neil Gorsuch
Amy Coney Barrett
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayer
Elena Kagan

You try to pick some of the dumbest fights.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Like I said, name it or go away.

Not a problem, I've already begun.

It'll be "different" when you do it however, I'm certain of that.

 

[NavigatorII]

The fact that you don't know who Ginni Thomas is speaks LOUDLY to your bubble.

Just checking to see how an email from a private citizen somehow is relevant to "kicking 10% back up to the Big Guy" is apples to apples. Just a word of caution before you stick your foot in your mouth, KellyAnn Conway was married to George Conway, major TDS afflictee. George never "kicked up anything back to KellyAnn". Please try and stay relevant here. 🤣

 

[NavigatorII]

Without googling it, give us the names of the spouses of:

Neil Gorsuch
Amy Coney Barrett
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayer
Elena Kagan

You try to pick some of the dumbest fights.

Seriously. He tried to equate opinions to "tangible assets as an unregistered foreign agent, drug abuse, pedophelia and corruption". Last time I tried to cash an opinion I got a "WTF??? Do you do makeup tips like AOC on Twitter? " 🤣

Edit: This is @kalimgoodman

 

[instaGATOR]

I have never went against my morals for any person, party or politician and never will.

So, now everyone can understand killingagoodman's total lack of morals by who he voted for, and worse, by who he still props up and supports....

You just can't make this shit up.... SMDH 🙄

 

[NavigatorII]

So, now everyone can understand killingagoodman's total lack of morals by who he voted for, and worse, by who he still props up and supports....

You just can't make this shit up.... SMDH 🙄

Kal is the master of justification, now matter how misguided or wrong he is. Like someone at a casino, double down when on a losing streak. Eventually your luck will change. 🤣

 

[kalimgoodman]

Just checking to see how an email from a private citizen somehow is relevant to "kicking 10% back up to the Big Guy" is apples to apples. Just a word of caution before you stick your foot in your mouth, KellyAnn Conway was married to George Conway, major TDS afflictee. George never "kicked up anything back to KellyAnn". Please try and stay relevant here. 🤣

Hunter isn't a private citizen? Must of missed him winning an election.

So a Supreme Court Justice decision can potentially be impacted because it would impact a family member and that's ok? She said she spoke to her "best friend", that's who she typically refer Clarence as.

So you're OK with a potentially corrupt Justice serving a lifetime appointment?

It's very interesting and I'm learning a lot about you guys.

I told you guys that a family member business interests and problems doesn't mean it impacts that politician at all. People can live separate lives from others BUT you guys told me otherwise, well until now 😂😂😂.

 

[kalimgoodman]

So, now everyone can understand killingagoodman's total lack of morals by who he voted for, and worse, by who he still props up and supports....

You just can't make this shit up.... SMDH 🙄

I'm not even talking who voted for who. Voting is tough on people because as I stated before, it can be a lesser of 2 evils. So we all have to swallow our proud when we vote at times.

I'm talking everyday morals that we deal with.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Kal is the master of justification, now matter how misguided or wrong he is. Like someone at a casino, double down when on a losing streak. Eventually your luck will change. 🤣

I'll be honest, I pretty much ignore @kalimgoodman's troll attempts cause they are so horrible. I watch yall tear him into shreds and start getting sucked in.

Case in point: Is @kalimgoodman actually trying to say that Justice Clarence Thomas is corrupt and should be striken from the Supreme Court.....cause he talks to his spouse???

 

[BamaFan1137]

Case in point: Is @kalimgoodman actually trying to say that Justice Clarence Thomas is corrupt and should be striken from the Supreme Court.....cause he talks to his spouse???

But Joe is good because Hunter wasn't elected. 😂

Auntie M, Auntie M...it's a twister, it's a twister!!! My goodness at the spin and "yea but's."

 

[NavigatorII]

But Joe is good because Hunter wasn't elected. 😂

Auntie M, Auntie M...it's a twister, it's a twister!!! My goodness at the spin and "yea but's."

This is the most pathetic Kal has descended to. Since when does an opinion transmitted via email equate to admitting transgressions (Hiden) of taking kickbacks from foreign entities, withholding funds unless they fired the opposition, and supporting his crackhead son (for the kickbacks). Gee.......somehow the first amendment got all entangled into the emoluments and fraud clauses. 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

 

[fatman76]

Just one?

You cried about the Trump kids cause libber blogs told you they were mean, but when we actually found evidence of Hunter's drug abuse and corruption in Ukraine, you said "I don't care about Hunter'.

You claimed that 'black people knew that Trump was racist', but when we had multiple examples of Hiden actually being racist, you ignored when he did what you claimed (but could not prove) that Trump did.

Want more or we good?

He’s comparing a *potential* conflict of interest narrow in scope (on a 1 to 9 vote) to the leader of the free world favoring enemies of the US because they launder money through his drug addled son.

This is gaslighting. He’s a troll. Engagement is a waste of time.

 

[NavigatorII]

He’s comparing a *potential* conflict of interest narrow in scope (on a 1 to 9 voteto the leader of the free world favoring enemies of the US because they launder money through his drug addled son.

This is gaslighting. He’s a troll. Engagement is a waste of time.

In one short sentence, this is why the USA will not ever be short of fertilizer 😂

 

[BCSpell]

No, the point is you guys CLAIM to care about this stuff. Yet when it's on the right...crickets.

I don't even fault you because you already admitted that you are a biased and unfair. So you're exempted from this conversation.

I have explained this to you before. Most of us here are Repus or Conservatives. We are not poltical neutrals. We are NOT scanning the news wires looking for anything supposedly bad about Repubs/Conservatives. We don't need to because that is what DEMS do.

 

[kalimgoodman]

I have explained this to you before. Most of us here are Repus or Conservatives. We are not poltical neutrals. We are NOT scanning the news wires looking for anything supposedly bad about Repubs/Conservatives. We don't need to because that is what DEMS do.

Disagree. It's not about scrolling for good or bad news. It's just...news.

Glad you admitted that most of you are frauds and only care when something is politically expedient.

 

[instaGATOR]

killingagoodman lives for the Lame Stream Media's FAKE NEWS, which he gobbles down by the truck load.

Manure processing is his life long dream job, and he's doing an excellent job in his current chosen job/hobby....

 

[Dr. Curmudgeon]

Ill start off by saying I truly don't care either way but I am curious as to why there isn't any outrage from the Republicans on this board about Ginni Thomas?

You guys have plenty of outrage about Hunter. I don't think a person should be judged by what their family do BUT you guys do, so...

A person on the Supreme Court is engaging in situations that will be argued in front of their spouse isn't corruption? Thomas was the only judge that voted against release documents that his wife communication was apart of. That isn't concerning? Like zero threads? Seriously?

It's not that I care but you guys once again prove to me that you have zero morals.

It's rather sad at this point.

Well, saying you don't care is quite simply a lie.

 

[BayouGator1995]

It's not that I care but you guys once again prove to me that you have zero morals.

Says the ass-clown who thinks it's awesome that KBJ made it through Harvard Law School; however, doesn't condone her for going soft on pedophiles!

Hypocrisy..........thy name is @kalimgoodman

 

[Capt Ron 1]

Says the ass-clown who thinks it's awesome that KBJ made it through Harvard Law School; however, doesn't condone her for going soft on pedophiles!

Hypocrisy..........thy name is @kalimgoodman

Remember..they do not think anything is wrong with loving little children