But uhhh why isn’t this all over the place?
Great news!
- Thread starter fsumc
- Start date
...and should therefore not need to risk the vaccine...regardless of how you view said risk.
Want to work at my hospital? Take the antibodies test or the vaccine (after FDA approval) and we can call it a day.
Why do I get the feeling that some to my left won't agree with this common sense?
Want to work at my hospital? Take the antibodies test or the vaccine (after FDA approval) and we can call it a day.
Why do I get the feeling that some to my left won't agree with this common sense?
I'm willing to take this at face value, but now we need to study if the antibodies are effective against the Delta variant of COVID, because that's coming next.
As are endless “boosters” and new vaccines.
Along with more masks and shutdowns in super blue cities.
I've noticed many people seem proud to get the shot. Like they brag about it. I say I haven't and I won't. They seemed shocked.
For any of us who have taken the most basic of classes involving immune response (mine is graduate level BME), we know that both the antibodies generated due to infection of the Kung Flu and in response to the vaccine target the spike protein and this is not a shock. So what’s the difference between naturally produced antibodies and vaccine generated antibodie? Bama said it best.
According to Fauci. The same Fauci that we now know has been lying to us for over a year about covid.
Yet as soon as he says anything about covid, sheep like @LizardGrad89 here snap to attention.
Emotional morons.
I wouldn't expect antibodies generated from the vaccine to be any different from those naturally generated from COVID exposure. They are both generated from the immune response.
No actually an early research the immune response and antibodies you get from an initial infection tend to wax and wane faster than the ones you get from the vaccine, but there’s not enough research on that to know for sure.
it’s amazing. it was like a bag of honor with some of mu own friends on waste book
Mild coronavirus infection leaves behind lasting antibody protection, research suggests
Even a mild case of coronavirus could leave people with lifelong protection against the virus, a new study suggests, with researchers calling previous reports that immunity was not long-lived following infection “a misinterpretation of the data.”
It’s actually much more complicated topic than that because several people were already immune to coronavirus before even came around in this version. So it’s gonna be difficult to tell what version of immunity came from one. Which is why it’s gonna be a little unknown for a long period of time. I’m one of those people that probably had a pretty strong natural immunity to crowbars in the first place because I was exposed to it probably more than most and if I did get it it was a mild cold. It is an interesting concept. But generally immunity from Kohl’s like viruses doesn’t last more than a year give a shit. But there are always exceptions.Mild coronavirus infection leaves behind lasting antibody protection, research suggests
Even a mild case of coronavirus could leave people with lifelong protection against the virus, a new study suggests, with researchers calling previous reports that immunity was not long-lived following infection “a misinterpretation of the data.”www.foxnews.com
Sure continue the studies. But right now everything is showing those that have been infected and survived have an extremely low risk of catching it again, better than those that never caught it and have been vaccinated. Now we see that antibodies are lasting longer than the original 4-6 months that was thrown out last year with nothing really backing it up. Bottom line is, the already infected among us are being totally ignored in the discussion and policy decisions.
Did you read the study? What’s your interpretation or take on this study?Mild coronavirus infection leaves behind lasting antibody protection, research suggests
Even a mild case of coronavirus could leave people with lifelong protection against the virus, a new study suggests, with researchers calling previous reports that immunity was not long-lived following infection “a misinterpretation of the data.”
You weren’t immune from giving it to BSC last night
Just what the researchers are saying, "Last fall, there were reports that antibodies wane quickly after infection with the virus that causes COVID-19, and mainstream media interpreted that to mean that immunity was not long-lived,"
They also said more studies need to continue which I do not disagree with. But at least they have data to back it up, meanwhile we were given 4-6 month immunity based on the head quacks “gut feeling.”
Did you read the study? What’s your interpretation of it?
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen numerous other studies call that one into question. What you just stated makes no sense to me. The body is producing antibodies in response to the spike protein, whether from a COVID infection or a vaccine. So how can they last for different times?
I disagree with this part.
Just because you had the virus or got the vaccine doesn’t mean you can’t contract it again or even spread it. It just means that you have antibodies that will fight it off and the risk of a bad ‘ride with it’ are significantly reduced.
Case in point...
Oh Ship!
I don’t think you are disagreeing. I didn’t say you can’t catch it but that catching it is lower.
Assessment of protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 million PCR-tested individuals in Denmark in 2020: a population-level observational study
Our findings could inform decisions on which groups should be vaccinated and advocate for vaccination of previously infected individuals because natural protection, especially among older people, cannot be relied on.
www.thelancet.com
I admitted I got vaxxed once on here. Wasn't bragging just saying. Just to even the score tho I tried to get my wife to go get stuck but she won't go. We're both Repubs tho and that ain't changing no matter how this vaxxing turns out.
Aren't the natural antibodies more effective and (likely) more long lasting based on studies from other vaccinations?
I swear I read this somewhere recently but I cannot remember where.
Also, even after your antibody test comes back negative, your immune system is more than capable of reproducing antibodies if it becomes necessary to fight the virus....correct?
I'm asking...but I believe this is correct.
I'll return to my doctor soon for tests. Since my #2 Moderna stab March 28, I've had little energy and lost 13 pounds.
My 7 day shingles medicine began May 15. Pain and itching lingers. Rash is fading. Weight loss began immediately after CIOVID shot.
My 7 day shingles medicine began May 15. Pain and itching lingers. Rash is fading. Weight loss began immediately after CIOVID shot.
I am the Director of R&D for a small pharm company. I admit we don’t operate in the vaccine space but I do understand pk/pd.
Antibodies generated from the immune response are all the same. What I know about studies is that the raw data may say one is longer than the other but statistically they are probably the same.
And yes our immune system builds ‘muscle memory’. This makes you less susceptible to bad infections the next time around.
I don't know a cotton picking thing about viralogy but I haven't even had the flu in 30 years. I don't get vaccinations, I smoke, I drink, I curse. Advice?
I am 73 , fat, have COPD and A-Fib. I felt like there was a good chance if I ever got infected it would take me out of here.
I don't know a cotton picking thing about viralogy but I haven't even had the flu in 30 years. I don't get vaccinations, I smoke, I drink, I curse. Advice?
Sure...don't get married.
You took a measured approach. I would have made the same choice.
I don't know a cotton picking thing about viralogy but I haven't even had the flu in 30 years. I don't get vaccinations, I smoke, I drink, I curse. Advice?
COPD
Lung cancer will probably take you out quicker.
Mom would have been 80 this summer. She spent her last few years on a couch hooked up to oxygen.
Similar threads
