ADVERTISEMENT

Goodness....is Nolec advising Gov Kemp on how special sessions work?



That's embarrassingly ignorant.

What part of the Governor's statement is not correct?

"While we understand four members of the Georgia Senate are requesting the convening of a special session of the General Assembly, doing this in order to select a separate slate of presidential electors is not an option that is allowed under state or federal law.

"State law is clear: the legislature could only direct an alternative method for choosing presidential electors if the election was not able to be held on the date set by federal law. In the 1960s, the General Assembly decided that Georgia’s presidential electors will be determined by the winner of the state’s popular vote. Any attempt by the legislature to retroactively change that process for the November 3rd election would be unconstitutional and immediately enjoined by the courts, resulting in a long legal dispute and no short-term resolution.

Perhaps you are giving credence to J. Ellis, the self-proclaimed "Professor of Constitutional Law" .... but her college has no law school. LOL Maybe she's a qualified prosecutor of election law... nope never had a case in any circuit or federal court. Does she call on the same debunked witnesses as L.Wood and Kraken lady?
 
What part of the Governor's statement is not correct?

"While we understand four members of the Georgia Senate are requesting the convening of a special session of the General Assembly, doing this in order to select a separate slate of presidential electors is not an option that is allowed under state or federal law.

"State law is clear: the legislature could only direct an alternative method for choosing presidential electors if the election was not able to be held on the date set by federal law. In the 1960s, the General Assembly decided that Georgia’s presidential electors will be determined by the winner of the state’s popular vote. Any attempt by the legislature to retroactively change that process for the November 3rd election would be unconstitutional and immediately enjoined by the courts, resulting in a long legal dispute and no short-term resolution.

Perhaps you are giving credence to J. Ellis, the self-proclaimed "Professor of Constitutional Law" .... but her college has no law school. LOL Maybe she's a qualified prosecutor of election law... nope never had a case in any circuit or federal court. Does she call on the same debunked witnesses as L.Wood and Kraken lady?

Well we are now down to one legal expert here, as @Uniformed_ReRe was smart enough to run away and leave you here to trip over yourself LOL
 
What part of the Governor's statement is not correct?

"While we understand four members of the Georgia Senate are requesting the convening of a special session of the General Assembly, doing this in order to select a separate slate of presidential electors is not an option that is allowed under state or federal law.

"State law is clear: the legislature could only direct an alternative method for choosing presidential electors if the election was not able to be held on the date set by federal law. In the 1960s, the General Assembly decided that Georgia’s presidential electors will be determined by the winner of the state’s popular vote. Any attempt by the legislature to retroactively change that process for the November 3rd election would be unconstitutional and immediately enjoined by the courts, resulting in a long legal dispute and no short-term resolution.

Perhaps you are giving credence to J. Ellis, the self-proclaimed "Professor of Constitutional Law" .... but her college has no law school. LOL Maybe she's a qualified prosecutor of election law... nope never had a case in any circuit or federal court. Does she call on the same debunked witnesses as L.Wood and Kraken lady?
It is not the governor’s call to make, it’s the GA legislature. It’s written in the constitution.
 
I can't believe he's posting here. I see the other sheep were smart enough to bunker down when the Texas case news dropped.

Not our resident legal expert LOL

Texas case is a joke. Good luck. Less chance than the amended filing they say they'll make in Kelly's Pa. case that got shot down today. So. Much. Losing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadgator
The Ga. Gov. says that it is not an option for a special session to be called for that purpose.
The state legislature can call a special session without the governor’s consent if they’ve found alternative ways of picking the electors.
 
Texas case is a joke. Good luck. Less chance than the amended filing they say they'll make in Kelly's Pa. case that got shot down today. So. Much. Losing.
By the time that one gets sh!tcanned, the Q wackies and the praying’ medic dude’ll have them jacked up about some other outlandish theory upon which the “imminent overturn” will occur...

if it weren’t so crazy and sad, it’d be fun to watch...
 
What part of the Governor's statement is not correct?

"While we understand four members of the Georgia Senate are requesting the convening of a special session of the General Assembly, doing this in order to select a separate slate of presidential electors is not an option that is allowed under state or federal law.

"State law is clear: the legislature could only direct an alternative method for choosing presidential electors if the election was not able to be held on the date set by federal law. In the 1960s, the General Assembly decided that Georgia’s presidential electors will be determined by the winner of the state’s popular vote. Any attempt by the legislature to retroactively change that process for the November 3rd election would be unconstitutional and immediately enjoined by the courts, resulting in a long legal dispute and no short-term resolution.

Perhaps you are giving credence to J. Ellis, the self-proclaimed "Professor of Constitutional Law" .... but her college has no law school. LOL Maybe she's a qualified prosecutor of election law... nope never had a case in any circuit or federal court. Does she call on the same debunked witnesses as L.Wood and Kraken lady?
Constitution supersedes state law. Otherwise, why even have a constitution?

And now you’re attacking the person and not the substance. Interesting.
 
By the time that one gets sh!tcanned, the Q wackies and the praying’ medic dude’ll have them jacked up about some other outlandish theory upon which the “imminent overturn” will occur...

if it weren’t so crazy and sad, it’d be fun to watch...
Sort of like the Russia Hoax and the Ukraine impeachment? I’m sure you thought both were total BS since you’re spot on re: every issue.
 
Watching the sheep get introduced to the Constitution in real time is a wonderful thing.
Why doesn't this idiot get charged and tried for sedition?

Joe diGenova, the attorney for Trump's campaign, said during an appearance on "The Howie Carr Show": "Anybody who thinks the election went well, like that idiot Krebs who used to be the head of cybersecurity. That guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot."

Sedition Defined

'' In other words, if you are conspiring or plotting to overthrow by violent force, harm in any way, or more specifically, kill any authority figure in government, you have committed sedition.

Sedition is a serious felony punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison and it refers to the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it.
 
Why doesn't this idiot get charged and tried for sedition?

Joe diGenova, the attorney for Trump's campaign, said during an appearance on "The Howie Carr Show": "Anybody who thinks the election went well, like that idiot Krebs who used to be the head of cybersecurity. That guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot."

Sedition Defined

'' In other words, if you are conspiring or plotting to overthrow by violent force, harm in any way, or more specifically, kill any authority figure in government, you have committed sedition.

Sedition is a serious felony punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison and it refers to the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it.
There is no such thing as the office of the president elect. This was a cute way the media is using to validate Hiden the winner. President elect has no power until inauguration.

Trump is the sitting president and has every right to choose his cabinet. He can hire or fire anyone up until Inauguration Day.

Funny you bring up sedition, anyone that tried to overthrow Trump starting in 2015 should be charged sedition even Hiden as he was in on it.
 
Constitution supersedes state law. Otherwise, why even have a constitution?

And now you’re attacking the person and not the substance. Interesting.

Show where in your Constitution, that the Ga. Governor must ever call a special session.
 
Just put down the bong and just walk away slowly...........WTF are you even talking about? 🤣

Try to keep up. In post 17 The Ga. Gov. quote says the legislature can't retroactively change the 1960's Ga.Assenbly election laws. SO he could not call a special session to do so. Poster said it was not constitutional.
 
Like I already said, can't wait for all this crap to be over. I cannot believe the S.C. will want to get involved in any of it. Should not get involved, and they probably wont.
 
Like I already said, can't wait for all this crap to be over. I cannot believe the S.C. will want to get involved in any of it. Should not get involved, and they probably wont.
Actually the Supreme Court lives for this shit. For all nine of those justices this will be the most important decision of their lives and literally what they are remembered for forever. You don’t make it to the supreme court without wanting that.
 
Actually the Supreme Court lives for this shit. For all nine of those justices this will be the most important decision of their lives and literally what they are remembered for forever. You don’t make it to the supreme court without wanting that.
gator, let's see........jim
 
Why doesn't this idiot get charged and tried for sedition?

Joe diGenova, the attorney for Trump's campaign, said during an appearance on "The Howie Carr Show": "Anybody who thinks the election went well, like that idiot Krebs who used to be the head of cybersecurity. That guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot."

Sedition Defined

'' In other words, if you are conspiring or plotting to overthrow by violent force, harm in any way, or more specifically, kill any authority figure in government, you have committed sedition.

Sedition is a serious felony punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison and it refers to the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it.

By that defintion both obama and Hiden are guilty.
 
@Nolec knows he is wrong so he's trying to deflect.

State Legislature can call a Special Session and they can select state electors via the Constitution Article II. @Nolec and Kemp are wrong.
[/QUOTE

I doubt they can even get a special session called, but they don't have authority to retroactively override the election because they don't like the voter's decision. That's called a coup.

"State law is clear: the legislature could only direct an alternative method for choosing presidential electors if the election was not able to be held on the date set by federal law. In the 1960s, the General Assembly decided that Georgia’s presidential electors will be determined by the winner of the state’s popular vote. Any attempt by the legislature to retroactively change that process for the November 3rd election would be unconstitutional and immediately enjoined by the courts, resulting in a long legal dispute and no short-term resolution. "

The US Constitution does not provide cover that that action.
 
COTUS trumps Ga law in regards to presidential elections If Ga leg meets and appoint electors then I would believe SCOTUS would find that is constitutional.
 
COTUS trumps Ga law in regards to presidential elections If Ga leg meets and appoint electors then I would believe SCOTUS would find that is constitutional.

If Ga. legis. meets and appoints electors contrary to the Ga. General Assembly laws passed in early '60's , then the Ga. Supreme Court would have a case to resolve for sure.
 
Like I already said, can't wait for all this crap to be over. I cannot believe the S.C. will want to get involved in any of it. Should not get involved, and they probably wont.
Seriously? Regardless of what aisle you find yourself on, as an American you should be absolutely livid at what has been uncovered as well as to what’s to come in the coming weeks. Our constitution and our elections are what make all of us free unlike other countries and this election has been nothing but a joke.
 
Seriously? Regardless of what aisle you find yourself on, as an American you should be absolutely livid at what has been uncovered as well as to what’s to come in the coming weeks. Our constitution and our elections are what make all of us free unlike other countries and this election has been nothing but a joke.

Half the country is brainwashed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martycat1
Seriously? Regardless of what aisle you find yourself on, as an American you should be absolutely livid at what has been uncovered as well as to what’s to come in the coming weeks. Our constitution and our elections are what make all of us free unlike other countries and this election has been nothing but a joke.
Bill, I can't exactly explain how I feel, but I just don't believe all this stuff that has supposedly gone on, and apparently the courts don't either. It's all too coincidental, and taking place in the states that not only Biden needs, but also that Trump needs so he can step in with all his bluster and righteous indignation. There is so much that keeps "coming to a head" it's like a pre planned game book. There is too much that sounds like a conspiracy that I can't keep up with it all. so I just keep reading shaking my head the whole time. Nothing happened in the other states Biden won? That also seems strange to me.

Finally, I don't have the education that many of you obviously do, but I will say if any of this stuff is true it definitely needs to be straightened out so it can't happen again. I also know that as long as there are crooks in the world there will be those working to hack into systems and machines in order to screw up world order........jim
 
Bill, I can't exactly explain how I feel, but I just don't believe all this stuff that has supposedly gone on, and apparently the courts don't either. It's all too coincidental, and taking place in the states that not only Biden needs, but also that Trump needs so he can step in with all his bluster and righteous indignation.

Jimbo, both obama and Trump whipped Hiden's ass in votes all across the country EXCEPT in 1 city in each swing state.

Hiden did terrible all across the country EXCEPT in:

Atlanta
Detroit
Philadelphia
Milwaukee

Where he did better than any president ever.

Any objective person can look at the math and tell that something doesn't add up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martycat1
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT