Here is a list of SEC Champions. Page down to East Champs, and you will find Georgia listed 9 times. But wait, hold on, in 1992 and 2007 you lost the tiebreaker to another team. So I guess you really finished second those two years. Should we call the SEC and tell them they don't know how to confer titles, and that the correct count for Georgia is 7? Or maybe the SEC believes that tied for a position equates to sharing the position? What do you think?
Oh, and since that isn't the official SEC list, here is also the Georgia wiki page, guess how many East titles they claim. NINE. So it looks like ties, when it's Georgia, count, but ties, when it's Florida, don't. Interesting.
Only fleas could think tied for second means third. Where, in the term "tied for second", does it say third? Looking, don't see the word "third". Silly fleas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Southeastern_Conference_champions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Bulldogs_football