Kamala Slams ‘Illegitimate’ Justice Amy Coney Barrett: ‘We Won’t Forget This’

[kjfreeze]

Let's check out her tweet:
Today Republicans denied the will of the American people [LIE] by confirming a Supreme Court justice through an illegitimate process[LIE]—all in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR] and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR]. We won’t forget this.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ustice-amy-coney-barrett-we-wont-forget-this/

Carry on my friends...

 

[nail1988]

Let's check out her tweet:
Today Republicans denied the will of the American people [LIE] by confirming a Supreme Court justice through an illegitimate process[LIE]—all in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR] and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR]. We won’t forget this.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ustice-amy-coney-barrett-we-wont-forget-this/

Carry on my friends...

She’s a nasty women

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

If she held the same stance in 2016 regarding Merrick Garland, then she can talk. Of course she wanted Merrick pushed through immediately so she's being a liar and hypocrite now. You can tell why the dems picked her.

Mitch said the same thing in 2016 he did in 2020: "We have the majority, we call the shots. Elections have consequences"

 

[gator1776]

Let's check out her tweet:
Today Republicans denied the will of the American people [LIE] by confirming a Supreme Court justice through an illegitimate process[LIE]—all in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR] and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR]. We won’t forget this.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ustice-amy-coney-barrett-we-wont-forget-this/

Carry on my friends...

WAIT............................................POLITICANS LIE?

OMG, I NEVER KNEW.

 

[gator1776]

BTW Kamala can slam me however she wants. I'll be her sub anytime.

 

[gatordad3]

Let's check out her tweet:
Today Republicans denied the will of the American people [LIE] by confirming a Supreme Court justice through an illegitimate process[LIE]—all in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR] and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR]. We won’t forget this.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ustice-amy-coney-barrett-we-wont-forget-this/

Carry on my friends...

Just another one of those GFY moments. Sore loser just like Cankles Clinton.

 

[gatordad3]

Anytime the libtards are pissed, it's a great day for the conservatives. Just witness the dipsh!Ts after RGB kicked the bucket.

Today, Mitch McConnell and his Republican cronies confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, tarnishing the legacy of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and undermining whatever remaining faith the public still had in the court as an institution. Despite Republicans’ attempts to obfuscate Barrett’s extreme record, let’s be clear: the Supreme Court is now under the control of six far-right ideologues who were chosen and confirmed not to administer justice but to administer wins to the Republican party.

“Amy Coney Barrett is a threat to the health and safety of millions of Americans,” the statement said, adding that the November 3 election of Joe Biden will serve as revenge for the confirmation.

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

Ms. Lockupabruthuh can't make dirt under Amy's toe nails.

 

[instaGATOR]

The Republicans are supposedly packing the court with 6 so-called conservatives to just 3 leftist socialist liberals. (I don't want liberals or conservatives on the court, I want strict Constitutionists. Don't make new law from the bench, instead enforce the existing laws as they were written and intended.

When President Trump was elected by the people, the SC was packed with 6 liberal judges.
The voters knew that the next President was likely to need to fill multiple SC seats.
That mandate of SC appointments was given to President Trump, the voters have spoken.

The Rats are OK with the 6-3 court packing, just as long as it's packed in their favor.
When the VOTERS disagree and put outsider Trump in office, they knew exactly what they were doing.

What both sides seem to forget is this: The CITIZENS are in charge. The citizens instituted the Constitution to limit what any Rats could do to them.

Conserving our way of life (conservatives) is what this is about.

The 'progressive socialist libtards' are being put back in their place, and as elitists, they don't like it one bit.

Next up is this imo, the TRAITORS to the Constitution and to the people, need to be put up against a wall and given what they have earned and truly deserve.... 🤓

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

The Republicans are supposedly packing the court with 6 so-called conservatives to just 3 leftist socialist liberals. (I don't want liberals or conservatives on the court, I want strict Constitutionists. Don't make new law from the bench, instead enforce the existing laws as they were written and intended.

When President Trump was elected by the people, the SC was packed with 6 liberal judges.
The voters knew that the next President was likely to need to fill multiple SC seats.
That mandate of SC appointments was given to President Trump, the voters have spoken.

The Rats are OK with the 6-3 court packing, just as long as it's packed in their favor.
When the VOTERS disagree and put outsider Trump in office, they knew exactly what they were doing.

What both sides seem to forget is this: The CITIZENS are in charge. The citizens instituted the Constitution to limit what any Rats could do to them.

Conserving our way of life (conservatives) is what this is about.

The 'progressive socialist libtards' are being put back in their place, and as elitists, they don't like it one bit.

Next up is this imo, the TRAITORS to the Constitution and to the people, need to be put up against a wall and given what they have earned and truly deserve.... 🤓

The Constitution is a "conservative" document. Strict constructionist are conservatives. The founding document aka the Declaration tells us our rights come from the Judeo-Christian God the Creator. We know this because the founders were all some flavor of Christian even if Unitarian or Deist. The country was overwhelmingly Christian and it was not close. Strict constructionist looking at intent to determine what the founders/framers intended will look at the document through that WORLDVIEW.

When properly done there is never a Roe or Ogberfell ruling from such a court.

 

[gator1776]

The Constitution is a "conservative" document. Strict constructionist are conservatives. The founding document aka the Declaration tells us our rights come from the Judeo-Christian God the Creator. We know this because the founders were all some flavor of Christian even if Unitarian or Deist. The country was overwhelmingly Christian and it was not close. Strict constructionist looking at intent to determine what the founders/framers intended will look at the document through that WORLDVIEW.

When properly done there is never a Roe or Ogberfell ruling from such a court.

I agreed with you up until you want the judges to view the world with the world view of a Christian. There is nothing Christian about the form of government. The teachings of Jesus would more closely come under the heading of communist. Religion is a man mad construct and it evolves as culture evolves. To ask 9 men and women to think like while men from 1787 is at best problematic.

Better to ask them to not legislate from the bench but interpret cases as a strict constructionist on the basis of the words of the text and the laws as written, not the hidden meaning be they Christian or liberal, until such time as the constitution is amended and changed legally by the legislative branch.

Just my opinion, you can now tell me how I'm wrong

 

[gatordad3]

The Left Doesn’t Fear Amy Coney Barrett, It Fears the Constitution | National Review

That’s what the tantrum over Justice Barrett’s confirmation is all about.

www.nationalreview.com

The ugly mother f*C*erS, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins can piss off.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

I agreed with you up until you want the judges to view the world with the world view of a Christian. There is nothing Christian about the form of government. The teachings of Jesus would more closely come under the heading of communist. Religion is a man mad construct and it evolves as culture evolves. To ask 9 men and women to think like while men from 1787 is at best problematic.

Better to ask them to not legislate from the bench but interpret cases as a strict constructionist on the basis of the words of the text and the laws as written, not the hidden meaning be they Christian or liberal, until such time as the constitution is amended and changed legally by the legislative branch.

Just my opinion, you can now tell me how I'm wrong

There need not be any "hidden" meaning. Often authors of law write about their intent. This was done in the 14th amendments case. Original intent can keep us out of problematic rulings and actions. If society disagrees with the intent of someone from 1787 it has recourse in the amendment process. My example in the previous post was more an example of the creation of rights that would not exist under originailsm. But textualism, what you are advocating, is another form of strict construction and even it is better than liberal activism and ruling based on the mores of the day. I prefer originalism.

 

[NavigatorII]

Let's check out her tweet:
Today Republicans denied the will of the American people [LIE] by confirming a Supreme Court justice through an illegitimate process[LIE]—all in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR] and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions [LIE TO ENTICE FEAR]. We won’t forget this.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ustice-amy-coney-barrett-we-wont-forget-this/

Carry on my friends...

Camel Toe is one disgusting, ugly skank IMO. That fake laugh, thinks she's hip and a comedian. She could be just one missed defibrillator beat away from being President when Biden gets the 25th used against him by Pelosi when he wanders off the reservation...........if the Dims defraud the election.

 

[BillCutting4585]

The Republicans are supposedly packing the court with 6 so-called conservatives to just 3 leftist socialist liberals. (I don't want liberals or conservatives on the court, I want strict Constitutionists. Don't make new law from the bench, instead enforce the existing laws as they were written and intended.

When President Trump was elected by the people, the SC was packed with 6 liberal judges.
The voters knew that the next President was likely to need to fill multiple SC seats.
That mandate of SC appointments was given to President Trump, the voters have spoken.

The Rats are OK with the 6-3 court packing, just as long as it's packed in their favor.
When the VOTERS disagree and put outsider Trump in office, they knew exactly what they were doing.

What both sides seem to forget is this: The CITIZENS are in charge. The citizens instituted the Constitution to limit what any Rats could do to them.

Conserving our way of life (conservatives) is what this is about.

The 'progressive socialist libtards' are being put back in their place, and as elitists, they don't like it one bit.

Next up is this imo, the TRAITORS to the Constitution and to the people, need to be put up against a wall and given what they have earned and truly deserve.... 🤓

5-4, Roberts is a RINO. Hopefully he gets questioned why he was on the Epstein flight logs

 

[BillCutting4585]

Kamala will need to answer as to why her and her husband are part of the Biden crime family

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

You don’t think it could have been a different John Robert’s....?

My Hope is that he is forced to retire and Thomas decides to retire and Trump is able to put two more conservatives on the bench for a 7-2 majority

 

[instaGATOR]

The SC should be made up of 9 Constitutionals, not by any liberals or conservatives.

Lib vs Con is what the F'ed-Up congress is made up of, and both sides are overloaded with long term swamp corruption.

I believe that Amy is an good example of what the SC should be made up of.

 

[BillCutting4585]

You don’t think it could have been a different John Robert’s....?

No, there are pictures floating around the internet of him, Epstein, and pedo Clinton in a pool. My opinion, he is a pay to play type and has swung some decisions.

 

[instaGATOR]

No, there are pictures floating around the internet of him, Epstein, and pedo Clinton in a pool.
My opinion, he is a pay to play type and has swung some decisions.

That's the same kind of security risk that a U.S. Intelligence officer that has 'a secret communist lover' would have. He should be terminated from the SC immediately.