ADVERTISEMENT

Chaney

grandhavendiddy

Bull Gator
Gold Member
Feb 3, 2007
6,232
5,166
113
foxnews.com/politics/liz-cheney-would-find-very-difficult-support-desantis-because-trump-similarities

It is one thing to have legitimate or TDS issues with Trump. (she has both) It is another to cast aside a whole wing, in full measure, a part of the Republican party.

She must be playing for a CNN Host role or funding/re-funding a think tank , advocacy or lobbying group. Wyoming is a lost cause. A 2024 run is a lost cause outside. Few/no D will vote for her over their nominee, some independents might as centrist Rs but no CPAC conservative will.
 
*Cheney. And Lon Cheney has a better shot. He's been dead nearly 40 years. 😂

9190-OuTOIL._AC_SX466_.jpg
 
I voted for Trump twice and would do it again. But if he is the Pub nominee he will get beat like a red haired step child. Too many people hate his guts and and his running will energize the fkn Dims like nothing else can. Even if we conservatives won't admit it, deep in our guts we know it's true. I'm not sure who the Pubs should run but it's damn sure it's not Trump. I know I'll get blasted for this but it's time to face reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
I voted for Trump twice and would do it again. But if he is the Pub nominee he will get beat like a red haired step child. Too many people hate his guts and and his running will energize the fkn Dims like nothing else can. Even if we conservatives won't admit it, deep in our guts we know it's true. I'm not sure who the Pubs should run but it's damn sure it's not Trump. I know I'll get blasted for this but it's time to face reality.
Congrats, you bought the media's agenda hook line and sinker ...
 
Had there not been mail in cheating along with the other scams run by dems, Trump would still be POTUS and Russian troops would be in Russia. The media has provided air cover for what "really happened" in 2020. As they did for the 1960 cheating in Dallas and Chicago that changed the outcome of Kennedy vs Nixon.
 
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-2020-0
Voting Laws Roundup 2020

Legislatures largely made it easier for voters to cast their ballots this year, but a backlash against voting access is expected in 2021.

PUBLISHED: December 8, 2020

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sta...g-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/story?id=72309089
Here's how states have changed the rules around voting amid the coronavirus pandemic
Nine states plus D.C. will send mail-in ballots to active registered voters.

By Quinn Scanlan
September 22, 2020, 6:57 PM
 
Had there not been mail in cheating along with the other scams run by dems,

All of the changes made for the 2020 election were done by the state legislatures
In republican run states the changes were made by republicans

After losing, crying about changes you put in place is lame



https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-2020-0
Voting Laws Roundup 2020

Legislatures largely made it easier for voters to cast their ballots this year, but a backlash against voting access is expected in 2021.

PUBLISHED: December 8, 2020


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sta...g-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/story?id=72309089
Here's how states have changed the rules around voting amid the coronavirus pandemic
Nine states plus D.C. will send mail-in ballots to active registered voters.

By Quinn Scanlan
September 22, 2020, 6:57 PM

https://www.tennessean.com/story/ne...s-south-now-activists-want-reform/6419005002/
COVID-19 changed election rules in the South. Now activists see chance for reform
Andrew J. Yawn Todd A. Price Maria Clark
The American South



https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-2020-0
Voting Laws Roundup 2020
Legislatures largely made it easier for voters to cast their ballots this year, but a backlash against voting access is expected in 2021.

PUBLISHED: December 8, 2020


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sta...g-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/story?id=72309089
Here's how states have changed the rules around voting amid the coronavirus pandemic
Nine states plus D.C. will send mail-in ballots to active registered voters.

By Quinn Scanlan
September 22, 2020, 6:57 PM


https://www.tennessean.com/story/ne...s-south-now-activists-want-reform/6419005002/
COVID-19 changed election rules in the South. Now activists see chance for reform
Andrew J. Yawn Todd A. Price Maria Clark
The American South

What Southern states changed for the pandemic (and what they didn't)

Early voting options and no-excuse absentee ballots are considered the first steps to expanding voting options. Currently, 43 states offer in-person early voting and 34 states don't require excuses to vote absentee.

But fears of spreading COVID-19 at the polls forced states such as South Carolina and Alabama to make their usually strict absentee rules more flexible.

Both states allowed voters to mark COVID-19 as a universal "excuse" to request absentee ballots.

As a result, Alabama saw 318,000 absentee ballots cast, more than three times as many as the previous state record (89,000) set in 2012. The 2.3 million votes cast was also the highest in state history, according to data from the Alabama Secretary of State Office.

South Carolina also shattered previous highs for absentee voting, with absentee ballots comprising 52% of the total votes cast, compared to 23% in 2016. The states also allowed no-excuse, in-person absentee voting prior to Election Day, a rare early voting opportunity for many. And despite the increase, the number of absentee ballots rejected in South Carolina decreased compared to four years ago, according to a report by The State.

Alison Parker, managing director of the U.S. program of Human Rights Watch, spent time in South Carolina, Arizona, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania ahead of the primaries to interview local experts and voters about ease of access to the ballots. Parker said they chose those states for regional diversity and because they were "particularly concerned about" voter access.

After November's general election, she said the results show there is a desire for expanded voting options in the state.

"I think we’ve learned that absentee voting by mail is a perfectly safe and actually very efficient way to run an election in this country," Parker said. "Frankly, South Carolina just needs to get rid of the need for an excuse. Election officials have the duty to make voting easy for every eligible voter and one way to make it easy is to ensure that people can vote absentee by mail."

Parker called the pandemic-fueled expansion of voting opportunities one "silver lining" of an otherwise difficult and deadly battle with the novel coronavirus.

But the responses by some states to the pandemic showed there's still a reticence to change firmly entrenched voting practices.

Alabama and South Carolina implemented the no-excuse absentee voting rule while battling federal lawsuits by organizers calling for a loosening of notary and photo ID laws. Both states refused to implement ballot drop boxes or eliminate other absentee voting hurdles.

"We don’t make it as easy as we should," said Gibbs Knotts, political science professor at the College of Charleston. "Clearly you have to make sure your elections have integrity, but I feel like we’ve gone a little on the side of putting up barriers."

Louisiana allows early voting but did not allow COVID-19 to be used as an absentee excuse. Mississippi only allowed COVID-19 as an excuse for those who had tested positive for the virus or were quarantined. While North Carolina and South Carolina allowed curbside voting, Alabama denied it. A federal judge ruled that Mississippi had to provide curbside voting, but it was only offered to those who showed symptoms or believed they had been exposed to COVID-19.

Mississippi still saw a record number of absentee ballots cast, but Mississippi League of Women Voters co-president Christy Wheeler said improvements have to be made ahead of the 2021 municipal elections as COVID-19 cases continue to rise.

"Mississippi is one of those states it is the hardest one to vote in. It is disappointing and disenfranchising," Wheeler said. "We are looking at trying to get online voter registration approved. Working with legislatures to expand COVID allowances so if you are afraid of going to the polls you can vote absentee.”

Early voting options and no-excuse absentee ballots are considered the first steps to expanding voting options. Currently, 43 states offer in-person early voting and 34 states don't require excuses to vote absentee.

But fears of spreading COVID-19 at the polls forced states such as South Carolina and Alabama to make their usually strict absentee rules more flexible.

Both states allowed voters to mark COVID-19 as a universal "excuse" to request absentee ballots.

As a result, Alabama saw 318,000 absentee ballots cast, more than three times as many as the previous state record (89,000) set in 2012. The 2.3 million votes cast was also the highest in state history, according to data from the Alabama Secretary of State Office.

South Carolina also shattered previous highs for absentee voting, with absentee ballots comprising 52% of the total votes cast, compared to 23% in 2016. The states also allowed no-excuse, in-person absentee voting prior to Election Day, a rare early voting opportunity for many. And despite the increase, the number of absentee ballots rejected in South Carolina decreased compared to four years ago, according to a report by The State.

Alison Parker, managing director of the U.S. program of Human Rights Watch, spent time in South Carolina, Arizona, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania ahead of the primaries to interview local experts and voters about ease of access to the ballots. Parker said they chose those states for regional diversity and because they were "particularly concerned about" voter access.

After November's general election, she said the results show there is a desire for expanded voting options in the state.

"I think we’ve learned that absentee voting by mail is a perfectly safe and actually very efficient way to run an election in this country," Parker said. "Frankly, South Carolina just needs to get rid of the need for an excuse. Election officials have the duty to make voting easy for every eligible voter and one way to make it easy is to ensure that people can vote absentee by mail."

Parker called the pandemic-fueled expansion of voting opportunities one "silver lining" of an otherwise difficult and deadly battle with the novel coronavirus.

But the responses by some states to the pandemic showed there's still a reticence to change firmly entrenched voting practices.

Alabama and South Carolina implemented the no-excuse absentee voting rule while battling federal lawsuits by organizers calling for a loosening of notary and photo ID laws. Both states refused to implement ballot drop boxes or eliminate other absentee voting hurdles.

"We don’t make it as easy as we should," said Gibbs Knotts, political science professor at the College of Charleston. "Clearly you have to make sure your elections have integrity, but I feel like we’ve gone a little on the side of putting up barriers."

Louisiana allows early voting but did not allow COVID-19 to be used as an absentee excuse. Mississippi only allowed COVID-19 as an excuse for those who had tested positive for the virus or were quarantined. While North Carolina and South Carolina allowed curbside voting, Alabama denied it. A federal judge ruled that Mississippi had to provide curbside voting, but it was only offered to those who showed symptoms or believed they had been exposed to COVID-19.

Mississippi still saw a record number of absentee ballots cast, but Mississippi League of Women Voters co-president Christy Wheeler said improvements have to be made ahead of the 2021 municipal elections as COVID-19 cases continue to rise.

"Mississippi is one of those states it is the hardest one to vote in. It is disappointing and disenfranchising," Wheeler said. "We are looking at trying to get online voter registration approved. Working with legislatures to expand COVID allowances so if you are afraid of going to the polls you can vote absentee.”
 
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-2020-0
Voting Laws Roundup 2020

Legislatures largely made it easier for voters to cast their ballots this year, but a backlash against voting access is expected in 2021.

PUBLISHED: December 8, 2020

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sta...g-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/story?id=72309089
Here's how states have changed the rules around voting amid the coronavirus pandemic
Nine states plus D.C. will send mail-in ballots to active registered voters.

By Quinn Scanlan
September 22, 2020, 6:57 PM
It's real simple. You can't prove who you are, you don't deserve a vote. That goes for mythical people too. Everything else in life we have to prove our identity, so why not the single most important thing we do for our country? I think that in itself is glaringly obvious. Democrats have to cheat to win elections, because very few are buying what they are selling.
 
It's real simple. You can't prove who you are, you don't deserve a vote.

GOP legislatures decided the rules...So its real simple who you have an issue with

That goes for mythical people too. Everything else in life we have to prove our identity, so why not the single most important thing we do for our country?

You know somewhere ID requirements weren't needed?

You might think ID requirements weren't strict enough but again...
Who was responsible for those rules?


I think that in itself is glaringly obvious. Democrats have to cheat to win elections, because very few are buying what they are selling.

For the last time...Democrats didn't magically make the rules happen
GOP led legislatures made those rules you think allowed for "cheating"


Funny, not only do you have the target of your frustrations wrong but also your claim of cheating

Has one audit found any of the claims of conservatives true?
Nope.

Has any of the lawsuits succeeded?
Nope.
 
Congrats, you bought the media's agenda hook line and sinker ...
Absolutely!

Let's look at this logically: As we head into the 2024 election, it is obvious to everyone that Ron DeSantis is insanely popular among the republican party. Yet even with DeSantis' popularity, Trump is at 69% in the CPAC straw poll and GAINING SUPPORT. And roughly half the support he gained from earlier this year IS COMING AT DESANTIS' EXPENSE!

So you can't even say 'well people want Trump cause there's no one else'. There IS someone else! Ron DeSantis is the 2nd best candidate the republican party has produced since Reagan.

The problem is, he's up against the BEST candidate the party has EVER produced.

And here's a final point that the dems don't want to hear: The fact that Trump is GAINING support DESPITE DeSantis being an option strongly suggests that Americans believe the 2020 election was stolen from him. IMO that is the main reason why he is gaining support, because as we learn more about the corruption that happened in 2020, it becomes obvious to more people that Trump should be in the White House right now.

Americans have always had a strong sense of justice and a strong desire to right a wrong. That's why you are seeing a surge in support for Trump: They know the dems cheated.

Last point, and this is for people like @Steveerino @goldmom and @grandhavendiddy who have bought into the media spin that everyone hates Trump: Do y'all remember what happened in primary season in late 2015 and 2016? The media, especially CNN *praised Trump to the stars*!!!! I was a HUGE anti-Trumper at the time, and I posted about it often here. I told everyone this was intentional, they were propping Trump up cause they wanted him to face hildabeast for an easy win for the witch.

And that's exactly what was happening. The opposite is happening now for the opposite reason: They KNOW America *LOVES* Trump, and they are trying to chip away at moderates and RINOs like the guys mentioned above to get them to believe that everyone hates Trump.

Seriously guys, how many times do you have to catch CNN and MSNBC and The New York Times lying to you, before you stop listening to them?

Trump's approval rating is likely around 80%. Not among republicans, but among independents and moderates. His approval rating among dems is probably 50-60%.

Trump is the most popular politician this country has ever had. Stop being hoodwinked by the media.
 
GOP legislatures decided the rules...So its real simple who you have an issue with
You might think ID requirements weren't strict enough but again...
Who was responsible for those rules? For the last time...Democrats didn't magically make the rules happen
GOP led legislatures made those rules you think allowed for "cheating"
You really are ignorant (blissfully or willingly, that is the only question). In many swing states the legislatures had set the ground rules for voting requirements, and Democrat Governors, AG's, and judges conspired to change the rules. You really didn't think Democrat judges were going to rule against their party did you? LOL!
 
You really are ignorant (blissfully or willingly, that is the only question). In many swing states the legislatures had set the ground rules for voting requirements, and Democrat Governors, AG's, and judges conspired to change the rules. You really didn't think Democrat judges were going to rule against their party did you? LOL!


Please name the states where this occurred
 
It's real simple. You can't prove who you are, you don't deserve a vote. That goes for mythical people too. Everything else in life we have to prove our identity, so why not the single most important thing we do for our country? I think that in itself is glaringly obvious. Democrats have to cheat to win elections, because very few are buying what they are selling.
I agree with most of this. I need an ID to rent a car, go on an airplane, enter a corporate building, etc. You MUST be able to prove who you are - hard stop. Progressives look ridiculous when they call "voter-IDs racist".

Now, some counties allow for hunting licenses. That is BS. Go get a drivers license or government issued photo ID from the Secretary of State.

You must be a citizen - hard stop.

Where I disagree, is that there a number of R driven laws that are broadly unpopular. Case in point - Abortion rights. Great (and dumb) way to lose an election. Gay marriage - and yes, you can make intellectually sophisticated arguments over whether that right was enumerated in the constitution, but just let people do what they want to do, but take accountability for their actions.

Further, when they go on MSM to defend points, which they should, be credible. Rick Scott gets shredded here by Margaret over the Inflation Reduction Act:



If you are going to argue it, do it because the spending is over 10 years and the taxes over 2, or something that is clear, consistent and compelling. His tap dance around medicare negotiating on behalf of big pharma is ridiculous. These companies, for the handful of drugs in question, have not shown any great R&D spend. Are you really, Rick and the R party, going to defend Big Pharma to have ridiculous price hikes in the cost of insulin drugs? Really?

Republicans, need to be disciplined and focused on what they attack on. Lose that, and it is not hard to envision a scenario with rigorous voting laws but a repeat of 2020 Georgia happens both within GA but across the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
You really are ignorant (blissfully or willingly, that is the only question). In many swing states the legislatures had set the ground rules for voting requirements, and Democrat Governors, AG's, and judges conspired to change the rules. You really didn't think Democrat judges were going to rule against their party did you? LOL!

Please name the states where this occurred

Right off the top of my head, PA and WS, and possibly MI. He's really not worth my time.


There was no need for Democratic AGs or judges in PA

The republican led legislature (both house & senate) voted for the changes & the governor signed the legislation they passed


Election law changes for 2020[edit]​

On October 29, 2019, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed Act 77 by a vote of 138–61.[5] Later that day, the Pennsylvania State Senate passed Act 77 by a vote of 35–14.[6]

Governor Tom Wolf signed Act 77 into law two days later.[7] The law enacted numerous changes to Pennsylvania's election code. Voters were allowed to request a mail-in ballot without providing a reason.[7] A person could register to vote up to 15 days before an election and vote in that election, instead of the previous 30-day period.[7] It said that mail-in ballots and absentee ballots would be valid if received by 8 p.m. on election day.[7] The law eliminated the option of pushing one button to vote for all candidates of the same party, called straight-ticket voting; instead, a voter would need to select each candidate in order to vote the same way.[7]

The law said the state would cover up to 60 percent of the cost for counties to replace their voting machines with systems that had voter-verifiable paper.[7] Governor Wolf described the changes as the "most significant improvement to Pennsylvania’s elections in more than 80 years".[8]

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and the Pennsylvania State Senate both unanimously passed Act 12 on March 25, 2020,[9][10] and Gov. Wolf signed it into law two days later.[11] Act 12 delayed the primary election from April 28 to June 2. Act 12 also allowed counties to begin counting ballots at 7 a.m. on election day rather than being required to wait until 8 p.m. to do so.[12]


 
You really are ignorant (blissfully or willingly, that is the only question). In many swing states the legislatures had set the ground rules for voting requirements, and Democrat Governors, AG's, and judges conspired to change the rules. You really didn't think Democrat judges were going to rule against their party did you? LOL!

Please name the states where this occurred

Right off the top of my head, PA and WS, and possibly MI. He's really not worth my time.

Wisconsin? The republicans won the Wisconsin arguments prior to the election

The SCOTUS sided with the republicans they didn't change their longstanding laws

Is the SCOTUS the democratic judges you speak of? 🤣

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news...es-change-wisconsins-voting-rules/3670662001/
U.S. Supreme Court declines to change Wisconsin's voting rules, keeps Election Day deadline for mailed ballots
Patrick Marley
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

MADISON - The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin's voting laws Monday, rejecting an effort to require the counting of absentee ballots that are sent back to election officials on or just before Election Day.

The court's 5-3 ruling means that absentee ballots will be counted only if they are in the hands of municipal clerks by the time polls close on Nov. 3.

The justices determined the courts shouldn't be the ones to decide the election rules amid the coronavirus pandemic that is surging in Wisconsin and across the world.

"The Constitution provides that state legislatures — not federal judges, not state judges, not state governors, not other state officials — bear primary responsibility for setting election rules," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a concurring opinion.

In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan gave that notion short shrift, noting Wisconsin's Republican-run Legislature hasn't met since April. Extending the deadline for absentee ballots should have been allowed, she wrote.

"On the scales of both constitutional justice and electoral accuracy, protecting the right to vote in a health crisis outweighs conforming to a deadline created in safer days," Kagan wrote.

After the decision came out, election officials emphasized a message they have been hammering on for months — voters should return their absentee ballots as soon as they can.

"If you’re planning to mail your ballot back, you should mail it back as soon as possible," said a statement from Meagan Wolfe, the director of the state Elections Commission.

Both sides were awaiting the decision anxiously because Wisconsin is a battleground in the presidential campaign. President Donald Trump won the state narrowly in 2016 but has consistently trailed Democratic nominee Joe Biden in polls this fall.

Democrats, their allies and nonpartisan groups argued the state law requiring absentee ballots to be returned by Election Day should be loosened because of the pandemic and a slowing of mail. They wanted ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day to be counted.

Republicans fought the rules, arguing the courts shouldn't change election rules even in the face of a pandemic that is keeping many people in their homes.

U.S. District Judge William Conley in Madison agreed last month with those who sued, but a panel of the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago reversed Conley's decision in a 2-1 ruling this month.


The high court's decision upholding the appeals ruling came less than an hour before the U.S. Senate confirmed Trump nominee Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. She replaces Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died last month.

The decision is the end of the road for the case and means voters will have to adhere to long-standing rules in an election that is expected to have a record level of mail voting.

The district court ruling also would have given people more time to use an online portal to register to vote and allowed poll workers to serve in any community, not just ones in the counties where they reside. But the Supreme Court, like the appeals panel, rejected those changes to election rules as well.

The decision was reached by the court's conservative majority, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh. In dissent were its liberals, Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.

Gorsuch wrote that leaving decisions about how to conduct elections during the pandemic would lead to a "Babel of decrees" and that lawmakers were better positioned to make judgments about what to do.

"Last-minute changes to longstanding election rules risk other problems too, inviting confusion and chaos and eroding public confidence in electoral outcomes," he wrote. "No one doubts that conducting a national election amid a pandemic poses serious challenges. But none of that means individual judges may improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted."
 
Right off the top of my head, PA and WS, and possibly MI. He's really not worth my time.
Especially since he's needing Salon, Vanity Fair, and Cosmopolitan to back up his claims lately. And believe me, he's looking up other interests than politics in those women rags.....like maybe, that rainbow dress??🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
You really are ignorant (blissfully or willingly, that is the only question). In many swing states the legislatures had set the ground rules for voting requirements, and Democrat Governors, AG's, and judges conspired to change the rules. You really didn't think Democrat judges were going to rule against their party did you? LOL!

Please name the states where this occurred

Right off the top of my head, PA and WS, and possibly MI. He's really not worth my time.

In Michigan, voters approved the election changes 2 years prior

Election laws that were in place in prior elections continued to be the case unchanged for the 2020 election


https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1d8ede41-9133-4660-892b-b82a9cb12e75
Election Day 2020: Changes in Michigan Election Law
Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC

  • Ballot Pre-processing
In 2018, Michigan voters approved Proposal 3 which permits no-reason absentee voting. This, combined with COVID-19, has led to an unprecedented number of absentee ballots being cast this election. Election officials were concerned this could overwhelm the tabulation process and lead to slower, less efficient counting.

To alleviate those concerns, election officials in municipalities with a population of at least 25,000 are now permitted to pre-process mail-in ballots the day before Election Day. This includes removing the ballot from the return envelope – but not the secrecy envelope – and verifying the ballot number and signature. The ballots will not be counted until Election Day.

  • Ballot Drop Boxes
Ballot drop boxes are boxes where voters can safely deposit their ballots rather than mailing the ballot or dropping it off at the local clerk’s office. Drop boxes will now be required to be tamper-proof and monitored by security cameras if they are not in a location that is continuously staffed. In addition, outdoor drop boxes must be bolted to the ground or a stationary object in a well-lit area.

  • Cure Period
If an absentee ballot is rejected for whatever reason, including because of a missing or unmatched signature, the clerk is required to contact the voter and give them an opportunity to cure the defect within 48 hours. Previously, these ballots were simply rejected and went uncounted.

  • Spoiling the Ballot
Voters who cast an absentee vote but wish to change their selection before Election Day may do so by “spoiling” their ballot. Effectively, the voter can cancel their submitted absentee ballot and cast a replacement absentee ballot or in-person ballot on Election Day. Previously, voters had until 4:00 P.M. to spoil their ballot. That deadline has been moved up to 10:00 A.M on November 2nd, the day before the election.

  • Military Ballots
Active-duty military and their spouses may cast their ballots electronically. This only applies if they are stationed overseas on Election Day.

  • Ballot Harvesting
Ballot harvesting, or third-party ballot collection, remains illegal in Michigan. The practice of individuals collecting and submitting ballots from persons outside their immediate family has long been outlawed; however, just last month Judge Cynthia Stephens issued an injunction permitting the practice. Judge Stephens cited mail delays and COVID-19 as a reason to contravene the plain language of the law. The Michigan Appeals Court overturned the decision and reinstated the ban on third-party ballot collection.

  • Absentee Ballot Return Deadline
In the same case, Judge Stephens issued a ruling requiring election officials to accept ballots postmarked by November 2 so long as they arrived within 14 days after November 3. The Court of Appeals also overturned this decision and reinstated the requirement that absentee ballots be received by Election Day to count.
 
You really are ignorant (blissfully or willingly, that is the only question). In many swing states the legislatures had set the ground rules for voting requirements, and Democrat Governors, AG's, and judges conspired to change the rules. You really didn't think Democrat judges were going to rule against their party did you? LOL!

Stop bringing facts to a Libtards slanted agenda.
 
The three states navi named off the top of his slanted head did nothing that he claimed to election laws for the 2020 election

trumpanzees also believe that you can decertify elections 🤣
 
I voted for Trump twice and would do it again. But if he is the Pub nominee he will get beat like a red haired step child. Too many people hate his guts and and his running will energize the fkn Dims like nothing else can. Even if we conservatives won't admit it, deep in our guts we know it's true. I'm not sure who the Pubs should run but it's damn sure it's not Trump. I know I'll get blasted for this but it's time to face reality.
Wrong - Leftists will have a MUCH harder time cheating in 2024…
 
Had there not been mail in cheating along with the other scams run by dems, Trump would still be POTUS and Russian troops would be in Russia. The media has provided air cover for what "really happened" in 2020. As they did for the 1960 cheating in Dallas and Chicago that changed the outcome of Kennedy vs Nixon.
So, there's only cheating when Democrats win? 🤔
 
foxnews.com/politics/liz-cheney-would-find-very-difficult-support-desantis-because-trump-similarities

It is one thing to have legitimate or TDS issues with Trump. (she has both) It is another to cast aside a whole wing, in full measure, a part of the Republican party.

She must be playing for a CNN Host role or funding/re-funding a think tank , advocacy or lobbying group. Wyoming is a lost cause. A 2024 run is a lost cause outside. Few/no D will vote for her over their nominee, some independents might as centrist Rs but no CPAC conservative will.
Sigh. I have been saying this for months, but will try to get through again. They will do the same to desantis that they did/are doing to Trump. Only they will do more. They will keep pushing the line further until we the people make them stop. Same as a childs behavior. Give them an inch, they will try to take a mile.

This doesn’t get fixed by nominating desantis, it will only get fixed by showing them the attacks don’t work. You don’t do that by “moving on”

I give up with you all. It’s like you don’t know how this works.

The media and politicians are in this fight together.

The enemy of my enemies….gets my vote.

This isn’t hard.
 
I voted for Trump twice and would do it again. But if he is the Pub nominee he will get beat like a red haired step child. Too many people hate his guts and and his running will energize the fkn Dims like nothing else can. Even if we conservatives won't admit it, deep in our guts we know it's true. I'm not sure who the Pubs should run but it's damn sure it's not Trump. I know I'll get blasted for this but it's time to face reality.
By all means let the MSM and “Establishment Republicans” pick the nominee, that ALWAYS works out.
 
Sigh. I have been saying this for months, but will try to get through again. They will do the same to desantis that they did/are doing to Trump. Only they will do more. They will keep pushing the line further until we the people make them stop. Same as a childs behavior. Give them an inch, they will try to take a mile.

This doesn’t get fixed by nominating desantis, it will only get fixed by showing them the attacks don’t work. You don’t do that by “moving on”

I give up with you all. It’s like you don’t know how this works.

The media and politicians are in this fight together.

The enemy of my enemies….gets my vote.

This isn’t hard.
Yep. How at this point that it isn't glaringly obvious, is astounding. Apparently the lying media is winning. The sheeple will buy anything it seems.
 
foxnews.com/politics/liz-cheney-would-find-very-difficult-support-desantis-because-trump-similarities

It is one thing to have legitimate or TDS issues with Trump. (she has both) It is another to cast aside a whole wing, in full measure, a part of the Republican party.

She must be playing for a CNN Host role or funding/re-funding a think tank , advocacy or lobbying group. Wyoming is a lost cause. A 2024 run is a lost cause outside. Few/no D will vote for her over their nominee, some independents might as centrist Rs but no CPAC conservative will.
I hope this clears things up for people who wonder why we dislike RINO’s. She is on the enemies side, not REAL Americans
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT