ADVERTISEMENT

Breaking: Project Veritas CNN director admits network engaged in propaganda to remove Trump

There is hidden video of Trump claiming sexual exploits or whatever. Dismissed as “locker room talk.” But he was caught on tape, it must be true, according to your rules.
That’s an audio recording, no on disputes it’s Trump, what is disputed is exactly what he says. That was the left spinning the quote into something that it wasn’t. It’s called motive operandi or MO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsumc
How is it not the same thing?
Because one is a guy talking about how whorish some women are around rich people. Another is a guy working for a major news publication admitting to specific propaganda and disinformation they are peddling. The news guy also works for the same company that has been busted admitting these things in recent years.
 
Because the music is what draws you in and gets an emotional reaction, like a movie.

No one said they’re a smoking gun but they’re literally the people that are running these corporations on video admitting to pushing narrative.

It was you that said that you wanted to understand how to tell the difference between misinformation and the truth, well here you go bud, it’s literally on video so that your eyes and ears can show your brain the message. It really can’t get much clearer than that.
As I’ve said, I hate CNN, too. But I hate these types of hyped up click bait. Why can’t they show it in a proper format without the hype. I tend to not believe when someone goes out of their way to oversell a point.
 
Because one is a guy talking about how whorish some women are around rich people. Another is a guy working for a major news publication admitting to specific propaganda and disinformation they are peddling. The news guy also works for the same company that has been busted admitting these things in recent years.

giphy.gif
 
That’s an audio recording, no on disputes it’s Trump, what is disputed is exactly what he says. That was the left spinning the quote into something that it wasn’t. It’s called motive operandi or MO.
So the right would not “spin?”
 
Does it bother anyone that they use heavily edited quotes, quick hits, and dramatic music to emphasize their points? Why is that necessary except to dramatize it and to me it makes it less credible.
I do not dispute that CNN is biased and the probably did conspire to take down Trump. Just pointing out that these videos are not the smoking gun y'all want them to be.

I've never cared for that type of editing. All sides seem to do it and it's wrong. Often it is done to the producers detriment because the fact that it was edited castes doubt...or allows an excuse for one to doubt if they would prefer not to believe the subject matter.

That said, did you listen to these clips? If so, do you believe that the editing changed the context? I do not, personally.
 
Because one is a guy talking about how whorish some women are around rich people. Another is a guy working for a major news publication admitting to specific propaganda and disinformation they are peddling. The news guy also works for the same company that has been busted admitting these things in recent years.
I’m not talking about the content but the context. They twisted Trumps words. Whose to say they didn’t twist the CNN guy’s words.
 
As I’ve said, I hate CNN, too. But I hate these types of hyped up click bait. Why can’t they show it in a proper format without the hype. I tend to not believe when someone goes out of their way to oversell a point.
So what’s the difference between what Veritas does and the news does (left and right)? Both use flashing graphics and music to catch your attention.

The difference? One is the footage of the people running CNN admitting it. Also known as “from the horses mouth”
 
Only sheep blindly follow without question. You want it to be true so don’t question it.
Dude. DUDE. It's a video of a person saying something. Of course it's true. Just like the audio of Trump saying something is true.

YOU are the one that's questioning, because you don't want to admit that CNN is a lying source that duped you.

It happens. Now that you know, you can stop listening to them. But we both know you will continue to, won't you?
 
As I’ve said, I hate CNN, too. But I hate these types of hyped up click bait.
Yeah this is another one of those 'I hate it when CNN does it too' guys.

Yet everytime we have pointed out in the past where CNN has done this, you said nothing.

Now that someone is busting CNN for doing the same thing, suddenly you get your back up and rush in to defend them.

Pretty transparent.
 
Ok, you wore me down. I will follow the right. I will not question sources if they conform to my beliefs. I will start to watch OAN.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: BamaFan1137
I’m not talking about the content but the context. They twisted Trumps words. Whose to say they didn’t twist the CNN guy’s words.
They didn't twist Trump's words, just like they didn't twist the CNN guys words.

It was on audio/video. We could hear for ourselves what both people said.

They may have attempted to twist what both people MEANT, but that only fools the slow and the sheep.
 
Ok, you wore me down. I will follow the right. I will not question sources if they conform to my beliefs. I will start to watch OAN.
You never did give me an example of OAN lying. And you said you don't trust OAN, but curiously, CNN is the one we've busted repeatedly lying.....and you've never said you don't trust CNN.
 
Yeah this is another one of those 'I hate it when CNN does it too' guys.

Yet everytime we have pointed out in the past where CNN has done this, you said nothing.

Now that someone is busting CNN for doing the same thing, suddenly you get your back up and rush in to defend them.

Pretty transparent.
I have not defended CNN. I am not defending CNN. I am just pointing out your hipocracy in claiming your sources are more reputable.
 
Ok, you wore me down. I will follow the right. I will not question sources if they conform to my beliefs. I will start to watch OAN.

BTW, no one thinks that you should actually do this. I know you were being funny but what all of us should do is watch, read and research from as many sources as possible...including OAN and CNN...but clearly not limited to them.

And not just TV...not just print...not just online...not just radio. If people will step out of their comfort zone, assuming they survive the aneurysm, they will be better informed whether they want to be or not.
 
BTW, no one thinks that you should actually do this. I know you were being funny but what all of us should do is watch, read and research from as many sources as possible...including OAN and CNN...but clearly not limited to them.

And not just TV...not just print...not just online...not just radio. If people will step out of their comfort zone, assuming they survive the aneurysm, they will be better informed whether they want to be or not.
Agreed.
 
I have not defended CNN. I am not defending CNN. I am just pointing out your hipocracy in claiming your sources are more reputable.
Because our sources haven't been busted lying.

Yours have. That's why we don't listen to your sources. This isn't that hard.

And please get a dictionary. You don't understand what the word 'hypocrisy' means.
 
CNN has been crap since Jeff Zucker took over in 2013 and said that he wanted CNN to have an “attitude and a take" about the news, instead of just reporting it. Now it’s all panic-porn and panels of blowhards yelling at each other, like FOX.

All cable news is garbage.
 
CNN has been crap since Jeff Zucker took over in 2013 and said that he wanted CNN to have an “attitude and a take" about the news, instead of just reporting it. Now it’s all panic-porn and panels of blowhards yelling at each other, like FOX.

All cable news is garbage.
Can you point to a Fox exec admitting they lie to their audience? Cause we just heard that from a CNN exec.
 
I have not defended CNN. I am not defending CNN. I am just pointing out your hipocracy in claiming your sources are more reputable.

Because our sources haven't been busted lying.

Yours have. That's why we don't listen to your sources. This isn't that hard.

And please get a dictionary. You don't understand what the word 'hypocrisy' means.
 
Every intelligent adult knows CNN is garbage. No idea why @G8trDad3 can't just own that without engaging in whataboutism.

"But I'm not defending CNN!' Ok, Cletus...
Please post where I have defended CNN. Never have except to point out I do not trust any of the cable news channels.
You want to say I have defended CNN in order to discredit my position. By doing that you have discredited your position.
 
Please post where I have defended CNN. Never have except to point out I do not trust any of the cable news channels.
You want to say I have defended CNN in order to discredit my position. By doing that you have discredited your position.
Your every response is a defense of CNN. You are clearly biased and have a vested interest in discrediting Project Veritas, because they exposed CNN.

A true independent that had no emotional investment could admit that looks really bad for CNN. You rushed in with conspiracy theories about how they must have manipulated the video, taken it out of context, etc.

The whole 'I hate CNN too!' is your attempt to hide your bias.

Do you think it's working?
 
Please post where I have defended CNN. Never have except to point out I do not trust any of the cable news channels.
You want to say I have defended CNN in order to discredit my position. By doing that you have discredited your position.
You said they ALL do it. No, they do not, not that blatantly, unapologetically and to that degree.
CNN is the kingpin of Fake News.

You're getting skewered because you chose "whataboutism" even when it's not true, and you've tripled down on it.
 
So CNN is dishonest. What a revelation! Again, I challenge you to post where I have defended them. I'm not surprised or shocked by the admission of the CNN guy.
Good luck to you if you believe that Project Veritas is completely straight. The proof is in the type of video they produced. Mostly hype with dramatic music and quick hits for dramatic effect.
 
So CNN is dishonest. What a revelation! Again, I challenge you to post where I have defended them. I'm not surprised or shocked by the admission of the CNN guy.
Good luck to you if you believe that Project Veritas is completely straight. The proof is in the type of video they produced. Mostly hype with dramatic music and quick hits for dramatic effect.
Would you claim that the police produce video of people admitting to murder? Or... would you say they press record on the camera and ask the questions to get a suspect to admit guilt?
 
So CNN is dishonest. What a revelation! Again, I challenge you to post where I have defended them. I'm not surprised or shocked by the admission of the CNN guy.
Good luck to you if you believe that Project Veritas is completely straight. The proof is in the type of video they produced. Mostly hype with dramatic music and quick hits for dramatic effect.
O'Keefe is exactly what he appears to be, and nothing else. His company infiltrates organizations covertly and secretly films their participants admitting agendas they would never admit publicly, then profits on it by publishing their comments. It's never difficult getting these idiots to expose themselves. Their egos are ginormous, and love to brag about their exploits. Vanity is one of their deadliest sins and weaknesses.

Your homework for tonight? Watch the old movie, The Sting. It will help explain all of this. 😂
 
Would you claim that the police produce video of people admitting to murder? Or... would you say they press record on the camera and ask the questions to get a suspect to admit guilt?
What is your point? Police have intimidated witnesses and produced false confessions. What does that have to do with the current topic?
 
What is your point? Police have intimidated witnesses and produced false confessions. What does that have to do with the current topic?
Because Veritas does exactly what cops do in the interrogation room. They hit record and start asking questions.

Let’s simplify this even more.

You’re speeding down a highway, cop radars you, cop pulls you over, cops wearing a body cam, cop asks why he pulled you over, you respond with speeding, you just admitted guilt.

Woman goes to Veritas, Veritas agrees to use the woman for undercover work, woman gets on Tinder, woman matches with CNN employee, woman goes to Veritas, Veritas puts body cam on woman, woman goes on a series of dates with CNN employee, CNN employee becomes comfortable with woman, woman asks questions, CNN employee spills the beans.

Do you see how these two lines correlate with each other?
 
What is your point? Police have intimidated witnesses and produced false confessions. What does that have to do with the current topic?
The Project Veritas video was them asking the CNN guy questions, and he admitted to what they did.

Then you started attacking Project Veritas, said they were taking him out of context (by letting him talk), and then claimed you weren't defending CNN.

Dude I know it's tough to see that your media is trying to manipulate you, but when it's this in your face, you look slow to not own it. Just saying.

This is why we beg you dems to stop getting your information from shit sources. Ask @Uniformed_ReRe
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT